OK, fine. Sarcasm noted. But the fact is misleading title+bogus claim+sarcastic comment when questioned can lead to a bit of confusion.

Yeah, engine mounted transversely vs longitudinally in the F1 car, no pushrod suspension, clearly completely different chassis (not to mention the engine was load bearing and the only thing connecting the rear wheels to the front monocoque in the JS27, something clearly not true in the Pug). I too will have to call BS…

Doesn't look like the lambo was going THAT fast.

I can see why the guys would want grip, but the fact is, at the yaw angles these guys are reaching, the wings, dive planes, splitters and the like will be doing VERY little. There is a reason why the higher the downforce to weight ratio a car has, the slower it is when sideways. It is nearly impossible to build a car…

That is shockingly convincing at a glance.

That's actually on the lower side of sportbike motors. They're hovering at 200hp/liter now. You can make a ton of power if you're willing to rev to 15k...

By the sound of it he's either pedaling it or breaking all four loose with every shift. either way dat shit cray.

I actually kind of dig it.

It's an '86. Most states have a ruling that after 25 years old you can apply for classic or historic registration. Usually this means that you no longer have to have the car inspected. I know in NJ they don't even look for the sticker if you have historic plates on it.

The seat looks bad because it has an airbag that went off.

Nope.

Skip to 8:05. He says it with John Hennessey right there. Why are you so resistant to this idea? It is registered as a Lotus. Period. Not sure how many times I'm gonna have to post this because of the comment structure here...

Skip to 8:05. He says it with John Hennessey right there. Why are you so resistant to this idea? It is registered as a Lotus. Period. What I'm saying is that there is a great deal more to creating a production car now than there was in the 60's before ALL of the safety and emissions red tape came into existence. Yes…

Yes, only because nowadays the hoops you have to jump through to create a production car are much more difficult.

Yeah, I too am gonna call BS on this being a production car. If it's titled as a Lotus, which I'm nearly 100% positive it is, then its a modified car, not a production car. The hoops you have to jump through to build a true production car are very difficult, and I truly respect the small manufacturers that are able to…

My buddies A7 has it. Very nice and not intrusive at all.

My buddy has a loaded A7 which certainly is no slouch and is one of the more practical sedans I've ever seen. This fucking thing checks ALL the boxes.

Ok, I was skeptical of BMW trying to distance the coupe from the 3-series sedan, but this looks pretty damn good.

I thought donks were 80's square body cars and bubbles were 90's rounded cars like the 90's caprices.

Water injection through the intake charge is harmless, to a point. Water in the crankcase is catastrophic.