It’s comical how easily triggered they are.

OMG the fb comments on this when you go to DeadBart or Daily Caller are hilarious meltdowns. “Fire him!” “I can’t believe the University aloud this” “This is what colleges teach everywhere now” “Can you imagine the backlash if he said black genocide!?”

This was my thoughts exactly! Are the Neo Nazis so weak that they need political correctness to protect their wittle fee fees? Should we send them a therapy dog to hug, the poor dears?

It seems the Nazi “Alt” right are the ones in actual need of safespaces and whose feelings are easily hurt.

.... haven’t pulled this one out in a while, but; Dear Mr. Lasner and Dear Husband of Mr. Lasner,

Congratulations, this has to be the stupidest comment I’ve read all day.

I’m not an American, and don’t live in America. So no butt hurt here. I just like to laugh at you since you are now the worlds joke!

In the last two weeks (beginning Dec 3rd) the timeline is... Trump calls Taiwan > China issues a formal complaint > Trump says we aren’t bound by the one china policy on Fox News > China warns this risks peace > China steals a sub. That is a fourteen day turnaround, and they literally warned us about this pissing them…

Now only if they ask for Trump as ransom.

Send in the seals!

He prefers to skirt the issue. A real round about way to chuck an idea into the brisket.

since he cant sell burgers at his restaurant and can’t sell his steaks at sharper image, he has to take his beef to twitter.

This is only tangentially related, but another thing that irks me is that people seem to think that politics is the one arena where everyone’s opinion (and facts, apparently) is equally educated and valuable.

Like, I would expect to be ridiculed if I, an admin assistant and MPP/political science student, argued with,…

The point isn’t this hypothetical “what if it had applied to Hillary?” bullshit. It’s that she was punished for disclosing all of this information that nobody demanded of those who were happily slinging mud about her trustworthiness.

She was not above such questions, but she at least allowed inspection of her financial…

To create a legally binding, individual document after vetting a person’s record to make sure they are not letting murderers out (for example) and then getting it to the president for approval, yes. But you go ahead and be condescending anyway.

Obama is signing them as fast as he can, I think. He has to sign every single pardon. Either blanket pardons aren’t allowed, or they have been challenged in the past and he wants to avoid that. I too hope he can find a way to pardon as many people as he possibly can. (And one for Hillary, too. Just to shut the GOP…

Jordan, please read Federalist No. 68. I would then recommend rewriting this piece through that lens, as it should inform your disagreement in a better manner. Not saying it should change your conclusion, but it would strengthen it.

This article means well but rests on a (all-too-familiar) false equivalence between Clinton and Trump. Both have large and small flaws as presidential candidates, but they are not equally bad, and “undemocratically” blocking one from office, had she won, is not the same as “undemocratically” blocking the other.…

It’s not “intellectually dishonest” to favor abolishing an institution that you also think should do the job it was created for.