I don’t think anyone is looking for a parade. The sad part is that you would criticize him if he didn’t make a statement about how against what happened he is. You would be on here like: “Notice how everyone except Arnold, with his shitty past behavior said nothing”

This is now what happened. He was already following orders by the police, he very much understood that why ever they were there, it was for him. He didn’t just walk out the door wondering what the pretty lights were for and get shot.

So the cops with loud speakers and flashing lights and guns pointed at his house was not enough? He was already following directions, the issue was not that he didn’t know they were there. The issue was they should never have been there in the first place.

And if he says no, they say, ok sorry to bother you?

I think its easy to say that when your behind a keyboard. Someone who called the cops to report he has shot someone, is willing to kill more people and himself, just reached to his waistband out of your line of sight. You say they were no threat in hindsight, but they didn’t clear the building yet and assess the…

They have tasers, rubber bullets, etc. However the guy responding to a hostage situation is not responding with a taser. A lone guy in the street with a knife, probably can use a taser or rubber bullets. A hostage situation where the perpetrator is threatening to kill himself and everyone inside is not a taser moment.

People watch too many TV shows, also your recommendations are all counter to each other. This is a tragic situation where everyone is to blame, but the idea that the officer can have his gun trained for a kill shot, and fire off a warning shot, then reacquire the target for a kill shot if needed is silly.

Justin T. Westbrook, writer at Jalopnik, would like to debate if it’s morally acceptable for millions of people to die in a preemptive strike against North Korea. It’s just something that came up over twitter.

Yes it would only stop people from being able to walk in on him when he was being a creep. He wasn’t locking people in, just making sure no one walked in.

Your clearly a troll. So troll elsewhere. And since we can’t prove your not a troll ... or a unicorn ...

Just because people are interested doesn’t mean its a story. Just because other blogs write about your blog, doesn’t make it a story. You want to write a story about a guy receiving death threats, he doesn’t want to talk to you, probably because he doesn’t trust a Gawker brand, no surprise there, Nev Shulman…

Forbes contributors are not Forbes proper, they write opinion pieces like blogs that specifically say “not the opinion of Forbes.”

so readers certainly think it’s significant that the person claiming to be an EA employee who was attacked but isn’t an EA employee matters.

Except you wouldn’t be doing it at rush hour because you live 2 hours from your work location. This is why this whole article is absurd, there is no critical thinking going on. I worked with someone who lived 3 hours from her job, she was there before I was and I worked the earliest shift possible. If you live 2 - 3…

I think you are taking it too far. You are a journalist attempting to verify the identity of a person, you can’t. So you write a story painting them as a liar, when you just couldn’t verify the identity. If you can’t verify the identity of a person for a story, you just don’t do the story, you don’t make your failed…

That’s not a proper counter-argument, they can prove you are not Pope Francis, but probably not just someone who works in the Vatican.

But he has never revealed his real name, so that’s not really a counter-argument. He has represented himself as an EA employee under a pseudonym, so he received death threats as a known “employee” on twitter. He now has someone prying into his life trying to expose his identity, which as noted he has taken measures to…

I think people are taking the “zero tolerance policy” too literal. It doesn’t mean there is a policy written that says “zero tolerance” at the top. All of these players have contracts that allow them to be dropped for doing dumb stuff. The more this is clarified, the more wiggle room you create. Well this specific…

Don’t do this, if you can’t pick a wedding ring that your wife would like, your probably getting married too early. If you pick the wrong gold, you clearly don’t know your wife that well, if you can’t decide if they want a diamond encrusted sparkling mess, or a solitaire, your probably too early.

But you are hesitant to accept Tesla’s PR because you already fully accepted the claim against them. Tesla’s argument is that they never complained about anything, the one complaint made no mention of racism at all. A year after they leave they now are saying they were harassed, instead of while at Tesla when some…