“Put up or shut up bro. I’ll play your punk ass for any amount, you fuckin’ sorry piece of shit. You and Fanatiq. Any amount bro, you fuckin’ suck bro. Just because I lost to Justin? C’mon bro, knock it the fuck off bro.””

The good intentions are plain to see, and there are few online communities more in need of an education on Dr. King’s legacy than gamers, but I am in disbelief that no one involved thought to disable emotes until after it was clearly a problem.

I think the one that I remember the most is a Melbourne newspaper running “Jeep: Don’t hold back” ads right over the top of an article about a dude deliberately driving a 4x4 into a crowd.

I’m sort of with you, though I’d like the SR2 co-op to come back.

Girls not dressed like strippers = woke sjw.

Ironically this roller coaster was enjoyed by the youth in Asia

... why did they do full physics instead of a set path to begin with!?

His name isn’t DaGrownAssManWhoTakesResponsibilityForHisActions

I would’ve never have guessed Tarantino had mommy issues...said no one, ever.

I really hope this comes to other consoles, it looks like it’d be right up my alley.

Tracking down an unreleased video game?  That’s so Raven

1) Because “cracker” isn’t a racial slur in Scotland.

little known fact that galactus eats wallets as well as planets

I’m guessing there’s a secondary reason to target big streamers, or random players in general: it makes it very hard to punish anybody for paying for this sort of hack.  Since it can literally happen to anybody randomly without their participation, it’s trivial to claim that it was random whether you paid for it or…

It would sound like “Obama Nation”, which they naturally would want to avoid.

Sounds like it should have been a world of pure tort litigation.

This may test the limits of the axiom there's no such thing as bad publicity.