Assuming all the same people (at least, the unsnapped ones) are still playing Fortnite in 2023, you’d actually have a 100% better chance, because the likelihood of seeing someone again doubled.
Assuming all the same people (at least, the unsnapped ones) are still playing Fortnite in 2023, you’d actually have a 100% better chance, because the likelihood of seeing someone again doubled.
I doubt they pay for it. It probably goes through the business side because how you allow your brand and image to be used is very much a business decision.
Wasn’t there an attempt to launch a Kotaku sub-blog where Lifehacker writers wrote about playing games years after release? What happened to that?
It’s not like “remake” and “remaster” actually mean different things.
Did we really need a remake of a game that was already a remake?
(Deleted)
It’s like when “retro” style 2D games first got big a few years ago, and they were always described as “8-bit” despite having way more graphical fidelity than any 8-bit console was ever capable of.
So a procedural cop show?
No one’s maintaining a dress like that. It was made specifically for this event, for publicity, and will probably never be worn again. It draws attention to the brand so they can sell less ostentatious products to general consumers.
I mean, it’s edgy when it pops up in a movie based on something as established and sterile as Pokemon.
Ah, it’s debatable on how many f-bombs and the context they can use as the MPAA is never consistent at all.
To be fair, replace “Japanese” with “a US citizen” and you’ve got an American news comment section.
I imagine training with an ally’s air force is just as, if not more expensive than training with USAF pilots and planes.
If he actually comes back. It seemed like Hulk and Thor were set up so that it’ll be easy to keep using them or entirely write them out of the universe.
He’s never actually in the same frame, though. Given what I’ve heard about how redacted the scripts were, he may not have known what him and the other characters were supposed to be looking at.
I don’t think the actor’s height really matters for motion capture. They can make the character model whatever size they want in the film.
They weren’t saying that. They said it was portrayed well, as in the acting and writing did a good job of conveying how (not) well she was dealing with it.
Surprised I had to scroll this far to see this explanation. A single individual did this to them and everyone knows it. He’s Hitler on a universal level. No shit people are traumatized by it.
A side-by-side comparison video would help this article a lot.