If you’ve never worked in sales (or bought something from a salesperson) you’d know that people are NOT logical creatures and frequently make decisions that do not maximize their financial best interests.

We took our, at the time, 6th month old to an appointment of a for sale by owner home. and when the grandmother who was selling the place asked if she could hold him, why yes, yes you can. offer accepted the next day. out of about 20 or so.

Don’t write a letter to sellers... as that might persuade them to accept something other than just the most cash. Exactly who is this expert advice given by?  It is provided by the group that wants to charge a 6% fee to the seller, be that property worth 50K or 2 Million. Do you see any conflict of interest here?!…

It’s almost like these buyers are trying every trick in the book to make sure that the negotiations go their way.  How dare they.

I should have realized it wouldn’t be the case as this is LH and not Giz but that this isn’t yet another damn tracking device to tag your kid with and monitor from a smartphone is something I appreciate immensely

The idea is that we forgive now. And then when all the boomers finally die (which I personally can’t wait for) we can finally fix the whole situation and probably do another wave of forgiveness. McConnell’s probably gonna live forever though. 

Student loan payments basically function as taxes on tax payers now. And the people who pay them are less likely to be able to bear the burden. Your comment is actually an argument that the debt should be forgiven and taxes raised on the rich.  Redistributing wealth to meet needs is literally why we have taxes.

To me denying future students debt cancellation because we had to work through it is the same kind of thinking that allows things like hazing rituals to continue: We had to suffer, so everyone else should as well.  Sure, it’s annoying that we missed or partly missed the chance (I’m half way through my student debt),…

And furthermore The Problem With Popplers is problematic.

I’ve only heard of this during college (got suckered into a meeting by a friend). It was enlightening to see the pyramid scheme in action. Made myself a royal-pain while I was there because if I had to suffer, I’m going to ruin the MDM’s act. I was brought there under false pretenses to start, so I didn’t care.

I believe there may come a point the entire service has to come down.

But... why should it? Fire him, make the whole story public, the guy sure deserves it - but if the art’s good and doesn’t contain sexist tropes, than why should the whole community suffer as well?

The notion that entire, sentient races are naturally predisposed to certain levels of intelligence, or moral alignments, is baked into the game. That’s not the same as talking about “good and bad sides”.

You played it through twice and a second time was a nuzlocke run but say you don’t like it? That’s some Catholic level self-flagellation there.

Thank you for the same take I’ve heard 30 times completely unrelated to the DLC. Every time there’s news about this game somebody needs to drop into the comments to let us know “I DIDN’T LIKE IT.” WE KNOW.

being limited to one area only is really lame.

The miracle here is that the car crashed into the PERFECT target. The truck was on its side (allowing it to slide), the roof of the container was lightly reinforced, and the cargo appears to be essentially peanut butter. It was a total gooey crumple zone.  Try this with a propane tanker and see if the results are…

Airbags are not supposed to go off unless the crash severity is bad enough to warrant it. The windshield didn’t even get smashed in from this impact, only the front empty frunk crumple zone got bent up.

None of the AEB systems are 100% effective (you can read the disclaimers in every single manual to see this). Also Tesla’s AEB system does not necessarily stop all the way (esp. from highway speeds), it is primarily designed to slow down enough to reduce the damage during impact.

So what would Salty do?  Tip only 20%?