In Australia we call AWD donuts helicopters

The 3x figure is fucky anyway as like *every single one* of these studies it’s lazy af and doesn’t properly control for incidents per kilometre driven.

They’re unarmed (essentially)

There’s an element of when eyesight can’t see the driver can’t see anyway so should be either massively slowing down, or stopping anyway.

Nah it’s true - I’ve got a Subaru with just Eyesight active cruise control - and it makes a huge difference to road trips, or cruising in traffic to now have to spend anywhere near as much mental effort constantly assessing the speed differential with the car in front.

Yeah even *just* having active cruise control makes multi-hour road trips massively less fatiguing.

I very nearly pulled the trigger on pre-ordering one this week......and then I brought an Evo X instead lol

Double Big Mac and Double Quarter Pounder are permanent menu items in Australian McDonalds.

This looks worse in every way.

It’s a chicken parmy

20% less payload is perfectly fine for *volume* limited trucking applications.

They had the features they do have as standard (not necessarily in all markets) substantially before other players though.

I’m fortunate enough to live in an market with the full fat Levorg WRX (and own one) - got what I’d do for a WRX XV though :(

or the judge just CBF dealing with their shit

Looks like some weird American market problem - In Australia there are dozens of available RTT for under 500 USD.

Why do you think RTTs are $3000?

yes to all those points

I am amused with ugly sneakers being up there with the COCK SHAME

Silver Ford Fiesta had hilariously poor situational awareness.

The deathtoll from cyclists hitting pedestrians, even adjusted for mileage and density is basically irrelevant.