It’s because they’re awesome.
I dunno, call me a millennial, but I really like Audi’s new displays.
Counterpoint: a car belongs to its owner, and if they want to give it a cutesy name, I don’t see any reason why they shouldn’t. What difference does it make to the rest of the world?
To be fair, my Porsche is the closest thing to a grandkid my parents are ever gonna get.
Tom just pasted the wrong picture. He really meant to recommend the Porsche 997 Carrera S.
I hate electronic nannies, but the question is not how we feel about them, or how we think other people should drive. The question is, do they reduce accidents? If the answer to that is yes, then they should be represented in safety systems. The buyer is free to evaluate safety ratings and make a decision on the…
And autonomous braking? Put your fucking phone down!
I disagree with you a bit here. I think many of these autonomous safety systems can improve the safety of vehicles.
Where I take issue is with pedestrian safety weighing so heavily. I think it should matter, but it shouldn’t drag a vehicle’s safety rating down so much. If anything, it should be more like a bonus…
If you can’t see a 5,000lb SUV (usually sold in bright colors), or hear the sound of approaching 35" mud terrains, than you likely deserve to be hit for stepping in front of it on the road. The focus on pedestrian safety is mind-boggling to me.
This makes me mad because the car itself is safe to it’s occupants but it still only gets a 1 out of 5.
While I’m no fan of the Wrangler or FCA, it’s bullshit a car’s safety rating is downgraded because it doesn’t have automous systems. A vehicle is not inherently less safe due to a lack of driver aids. Why? Because people fucking ignore them. Just last night someone cut me off while I saw their mirror flashing with the…
We found the comment of the day, folks.
You’ve put more effort into the appearance than Chevy did.
There aren’t enough stars on God’s Green Earth for this image.