I wish I could just get all of this silk screened onto a T-shirt (with the words arranged into an outline of Bernie’s now famous wild-haired silhouette). Brava!

PhD from an Ivy League here (just to show that I’m edumucated as well, but I would like to point out that having advanced degrees doesn’t mean you’re automatically a more thoughtful or higher-information voter than those who have fewer degrees), and I think you’re vilifying Hillary in ways she doesn’t deserve, and…

http://www.npr.org/2016/02/02/465…

Um, the coin-toss narrative has been thoroughly debunked. Hillary did not win b/c of coin tosses (and in fact, Bernie won more of the coin tosses than she did). Let’s get the facts straight before making assertions please. http://www.npr.org/2016/02/02/465…

There was .2% difference in 2008 between her and John Edwards and no one was framing that .2% as meaning that Clinton and Edwards were virtually tied for second place. Everyone was saying that Clinton was in third place, and Edwards in second. And in 2016, Clinton was first, Sanders was second.

I don’t think Hillary is their compromise pick.

Yes.

I don’t really understand why you have to be so rude to me, but just take a look at the sort of sloppy reporting the NYT has done on her on this email issue (http://newsweek.com/hillary-clinto…). Their coverage of her during this campaign has consistently led with ledes that they then say is contradicted or groundless…

The key point in all of this was that she was not knowingly sending classified information at the moment, unlike Petraeus, for example, and was participating in a common practice that only recently became against the regulations. There was no mishandling of classified information because it wasn’t classified at the…

That wouldn’t have saved her that much of a headache b/c there would still have been the issue of sending (future) classified information via an unsecure channel. (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/1a67b7… explains what a pain going through secure channels is and how almost nobody does it.) There might not have been as…

I think basically, yes. I think the point she’s trying to make—one of them at least–is that rape is situation-specific or context-specific rather than act-specific: in her case, the same sequence of events was rape in one instance and not in the other, despite the pain and the violence being the same. I think the…

I think she means that if we see the video as depicting nonconsensual sex—rape—that we are reenacting the rape that this is ostensibly not a reenactment of. She’s trying to push the limits of what we can recognize as consent. So, I think she means “don’t watch this video without my consent” not so much to say, don’t…