It's good but you're putting it up against Heat and Way of the Gun. Very tough call.

In the context of the over-all public perception of the game though, Dragon Age: Inquisition was a hit.

Music box, use fire bombs, you can parry him in all his forms, and lure him up the stairs so you don't have to fight him among the tombstones.

"explain you need may need" this typo is driving me crazy.

This is what I figured. It's light sci-fi capitalizing off the trend. You can give people the concept and the twists but fall back on the historical stuff without having to make the sci-fi aspects too complex.

Good point, so I'm wondering if it's still not a full xenomorph and some kind of hybrid thing instead, like it looks a little different and certainly seems stronger than normal judging by the glass breaking (I'm assuming the glass of a spaceship wouldn't be easy to break) so that could account for how aggressive it is.

Love that quote. John Carpenter knew his shit. The Thing is like, the definitive movie that proves "rarely/never showing the monster" isn't inherently better.

People will complain about CGI creatures on the mere basis that they're CGI, ignoring the fact that we just can't accomplish certain shots in any other way.

Trailer CGI is unfinished

I would go a bit earlier and say 2011-2012 was the end of the slide. The Raid, Dredd, Ghost Protocol, Fast Five, Haywire, Jack Reacher, Skyfall, Looper, Resident Evil: Retribution, Universal Soldier: Day of Reckoning. Lots of good stuff. The years before that have the occasional film from Hong Kong or a DTV release…

That's also why the Dead or Alive movie works so well. It's just a bunch of solid fights and it never takes it self even remotely seriously.

Is the addition of some cheese and bacon between the fried chicken pieces REALLY that much worse than like, a regular two piece serving of fried chicken? Calorie wise it isn't even much worse than a lot of other fast food sandwiches, it just has a ton of salt.

I actually have an account, it just goes mostly unused >_>

The setting doesn't even appeal to me because I find the whole prehistoric aesthetic really unappealing outside of the robot animals and landscapes. Like the moment they announced Far Cry Primal, I knew I would never play it for that reason alone. Plus I'm worried it'll fall into Ubisoft's trap of just having…

I'm curious here: What is a "gaffer" in this context? I use the term at work a lot but in a more traditional usage so I'm really confused here >_>

Theme is hugely important these days, but I don't necessarily think we've run out of ways to experiment with gameplay, I think maybe just the conditions of producing a game have changed to a point where experimentation is less feasible.

It's actually the one thing making me want to play this now.

You make a good point. The article, and the AV Club in general, use a lot of slang and swears in general. It's not a big deal imo it's just their style, and complaining about the use of "woke" feels like some "get off my lawn" type shit.

Yeah, I'm on this boss now that's literally the first boss in the game but bigger, he hits harder, and is more of a damage sponge then he was the first time you fought him. He can kill me in one hit, blocking his shots drains my stamina enough to stun me, and his tracking is insane.
The other bosses have been nowhere…

There's only been like 6 or 7 of these games in the mainstream over the course of almost ten years. And if these games aren't made with you as the target audience then why complain about them? You don't have to play them.