And this thick skulled canned ham with ears does what for a living? 

That’s probably the most consistent part of American’s history, you can work for us in jobs that we don’t want to do but don’t expect any rights let alone privileges. We’re doing you a favor by “letting” you be here, be grateful for whatever we give you. And btw, we’re doing this for your own good you godless savages.…

Given the rarity of reported sex crimes and the even greater rarity of convicted sex crimes, that gives me little comfort, especially when you’re upwards of 50 known victims.  For men like Cosby, Epstein and Weinstein, rape is their morning coffee.

This is what I don’t get.  Sure, the fact that the white America firsters are pushing this line of b.s. and want to preserve the same entitlement and privilege their ancestors had but wouldn’t recognizing the fact that the country is and always has been a work in progress be a way for white people to pat themselves on…

There’s perfect, perfecter and perfectest.

Those aren’t amendments, they’re perfection enhancers.

Keep in mind that these are the same people yammering about “removin’ our history” when it comes to Confederate statues. Hmmm... I’m sensing a common thread here and it ain’t “our history” now is it? The founders left plenty of actual evidence about their thoughts on their work including the recognition of the…

It is true that he was a convicted rapist however legally he is not since his conviction was overturned. How about admitted serial rapist?

Odd phrase to use for a man who was too blind for prison. Yeah Bill, we remember that big talk about performing before your rapist ass hit the slammer. The only thing worse than an man who believes he’s entitled to drug and rape upwards of 50 women is one who thinks he can draw enough “fans” to fill a shoe box.

“Four witnesses corroborated accounts of the incident, though one witness admitted they did not hear what was being said. All witnesses stated that Holt was very intoxicated when the incident occurred.”

He was off duty, drunk and not acting in any official capacity.  Look for his buds in blue to take this “investigation” off the books.

Yep, gonna say the very same thing.  No doubt he’s use to talking racist trash with his cop buddies and was too drunk to realize that nobody at the wedding reception was let that shit slide. 

We’re talking about policing across the country, large forces and small. The culture of a corporation or an institution establishes what is acceptable and what is not, not policy and procedure manuals or training. Those likely get undone as soon as the rookies hit the streets. Don’t forget that Chauvin was a training…

It isn’t training, that’s for damned sure. We don’t need to train cops not to use tactics that are deadly dangerous and against their own police policies any more than we need them not to perjure themselves with false testimony and reports.

The purse could contain a deadly weapon, leaving the officers in fear for their lives... /s

Still, don’t think that there is any reasonable chance (maybe <5%) of catching anyone later.

And now the aged serial rapist has chimed in with the typical offender’s cries of “free speech!” and specifically calling out Howard’s law school. Maybe a first year Howard law student or anyone with a basic understanding of the 1A can explain that the 1A means that the government cannot police speech but everyone who…

Evicting Palestinians from their homes, bombing apartment buildings and medical clinics, attacking worshipers during their most holy week is NOT “restraint” let alone “enormous restraint”.  Israel has been and is oppressing the Palestinian people and what you get with oppression is terrorism.  Defending basic human…

Whew, where to start with this array of ignorance? First, notice the language used by the superintendent, all passive voice, shifting the focus to the teacher, the student and the student’s parents. Where is the board, the principal, anyone with responsibility for teachers and what they’re teaching?

It’s my understanding that the “citizen’s arrest” requires the “citizen” to witness a felony. That did not happen in this case. Additionally, the civil suit alleges that the trio was acting under the color of law having been deputized by local law enforcement to police the area, not as “citizens”. The bottom line is…