Either finishing the shrines in Zelda, or taking a break to play one of the four games I started but then put on the back burner because 2017 is overwhelming me with great shit to play.

I agree with your point overall, but I suspect the racial aspect is what got a lot of people more up in arms about the lynching Obama stuff, rather than the extreme portrayal of condemnation. Whenever I see a lynching reference, I always take it as a threat to the entire black community (I’m not black and won’t try to…

Are we lamenting the lack of nuanced analysis in a tweet?

So because he was a dick means he deserves to be inaccurately reported on? I’ve said it to others here, yeah, he was a dick. So just report on that. The argument is strong enough to stand on its own without speculation, embellishment, or reporting opinion as fact.

I’d have been fine with that. Here’s what happened:

To you, yes, a couple comments had two or three very short paragraphs. But how many responses to how many different people have you been spouting off on this thread? At one point, you were responding to every single person who was commenting (not sure if that’s the case anymore but in the beginning it was). This is…

I’m not, and haven’t, defended his actions. I’m just saying that to say he blamed resolution is factually incorrect. Especially when the article opens up with a just-when-you-think-you’ve-heard-it-all sentiment. It’s a misleading headline. That’s all I’ve been arguing.

So you’re leaving long ass comments out of annoyance? You come off pretty hostile. Subjective, I know, but I’m not the only one in the comments who’s noticed (or expressed as such).

As I said to someone else, I never said he wasn’t a dick. But sure, let’s have this entirely different conversation.

I never said it wasn’t a dick move. But sure, let’s have this entirely different conversation.

“Changing the resolution will help my play next time.” =\= “The resolution is why I lost last time.”

See, the difference is, you saying that doesn’t bother me. Because you’re just some random person.

Actually it just sounds like you’re angry at your core and think the worst of people. I suspect that’s what he meant by “awful.” Your anger at others has a greater affect on you than it ever will on anyone else. Unless you have kids or a spouse to abuse.

Checking the resolution settings says he was looking for an excuse/something to blame his loss on. Absolutely. But then he saw he couldn’t, and so he didn’t. You’re acknowledging half of the situation (his knee jerk reaction) but ignoring the other half (his informed conclusion).

Other people had complained about the resolution, so he checked it. That’s a sensible thing to do! I don’t really give a fuck about him, I’m more arguing against saying people did things that they didn’t. It’d be like saying a baseball player blamed his glove because he double checked the webbing after missing a…

So in other words, he didn’t blame the resolution for his loss. Like, at all.

It’s been...sorta fixed? They made some changes to pick up the pace, and also gave an option to bypass the Noctis portion by playing a short section as Gladiolus or Ignis (don’t recall which, but you basically play their section of chapter 13). However, I wouldn’t recommend bypassing the Noctis part if it’s your first…

I’m not playing much because I’m on a Memorial Day motorcycle trip in the mountains...but I did bring my Switch, so there’s been some Zelda here and there.

I name all my dogs Roach.

Yeah, the prologue section really sets the whole game up nicely, in both story and mechanics.