zandin
Zandin
zandin

I mean, I’d love that, but short of making a real lightsaber, I don’t know how you’d get a blade to look like it flickers/shifts/shorts out. I guess they could just make it really asymmetrical so it looks like a still photo of the blade.

We fucked up BIG with the Aboriginals and continue to do so. No argument there. And the call for that to change has been getting louder for years. With a left wing government in power for the first time in a decade, there is finally a push being made in the right direction. Trudeau pledged something like 40 million

As someone who has resorted to chugging cough syrup every 4 hours just so I can get some work done, I find that comparison to be VERY insulting to cough syrup.

I can’t agree that they “steal” synths. Synths leave of their own volition, avoid the Institute, and accept mind-wipes as the cost of freedom. Fallout 3 gave us Harkness as a saved synth, and his story is a perfect example of how much good the railroad does.

I have one worn smooth but otherwise working, and one that’s only a couple months old. As far as the grip, I’ve always loved it. Loved it on my two g5s, my g9, and my g700s and every other mouse feels naked without it. I’d be snapping up a third g700 if it wasn’t for the US exchange rate. I’m in Canada, so I take a 30

I have one worn smooth but otherwise working, and one that’s only a couple months old. As far as the grip, I’ve

I have to disagree, since I love that grip and tend to start itching for an upgrade as soon as it wears down smooth.

I have to disagree, since I love that grip and tend to start itching for an upgrade as soon as it wears down smooth.

You can think that all you want, but the legal precedent for sampling is very murky and almost always boils down to interpretation and the extent of sampling and modification. Fair use will always be contested and have changing limits. That’s as opposed to this suit, where it is one hundred percent illegal and immoral

Except sampling is an entirely different process with its own rules, regulations and cultural norms. Transformative works, or samples of short enough length have been repeatedly proven to be legitimate uses of unlicensed samples. Stealing a whole song as a backing track to your video is not comparable in the

Depends on the state and other factors such as infidelity.

Nah, he wins the case with omnipotence to gather evidence, that whole looking into your soul bit for interrogations, and rockstar opening and closing statements. Plus any jury that votes against Jesus’ client goes straight to hell.

Read the comments on one of Patricia’s articles and you’ll be convinced. Although I will admit I should have been more clear. The side blogs are full of literal human garbage commenting, but the main site is like 50 percent maximum.

I almost forgot to mention the almost addicting rush from trying to catch them all. It’s even more rewarding now than it was when the first games came out.

They talk about video games in general, but yeah, pokemon is still a thing. The games are really solid still, and have a lot of cross market appeal. Kids (and casual adult players) love cool and cute animals, and a story that is usually simplistic but earnest and appealing. More advanced players have a lot of fun with

Honestly, if you ever need to hate humanity in general, go slum it in kotaku’s comments. Both recommended and gray. The actual articles are good, but the comments are just MRA circle jerking at its finest.

Honestly, Deadspin represents the best and worst of Gawker. The ungrayed comments are usually great and largely supportive of gender, race, and sexual equality, but the grays are like the worst of reddit come to life.

In Canada, any amount deemed higher than personal consumption gets you a trafficking charge. To the point that 4 joints you bought for your buddies makes you a dealer in the eyes of the law. A whole plant guarantees you will do time unless you can afford Jesus Christ himself as your lawyer.

But the conversation had no real point anyway. It was a personal attack hidden in fake praise. It is exactly the same an negging at a bar. If he wanted to talk quality, he should have done that, but instead he chose to slide in a personal attack that was petty and uncalled for.

It’s a blog. Literally the whole thing is editorial. But the point was that the comment is so out of place. By singling out Patricia for no reason and with no basis, it fundamentally changes his comment. It is now a snipe at her wrapped in bullshit fake praise of Kotaku as a whole, rather than a real conversation

And I HONESTLY prefer a lot of what Patricia covers, namely the community itself, as opposed to repeated and unsubstantiated rumors that make up the other half of gaming press in general. In any event, the swipe at someone whose writing you don’t enjoy was absolutely unnecessary. Your opinion is not the same as the

You were so close to a decent comment until you made the backhanded swipe at Patricia. Just because you personally didn’t like her articles or the topics she covered, doesn’t mean that it is somehow sub par. Patricia’s work has been among some of the most interesting on the site for a while now in my opinion.