z2221344
TheWalrus
z2221344

The vast majority of parents do.  If it’s not up to your standards, that’s a ‘you problem’, not a ‘them problem’ - and you’ll just have to suck it up.

In fairness, having to think through all the product placement in the F&F movies would be a full time job.  At least.  You’d probably need to take on an intern, honestly.

Then they all drink Coronas.

Which is to say you have no response to the clearly laid out points that effectively countered your argument.

This is not at all like your Brooklyn example. In fact - it’s quite the opposite. You’re the one choosing to take a flight where you know infants will be present and then asking the them to adapt to your delicate sensitivities.  

I mean - if you don’t like kids so much, you can also choose not to fly.  If you drive yourself, you’ll be free of the issue.

We are quite literally never going to escape Star Wars universe hell.

I don’t I agree that there are a lot of parents on here who feel that way. I think the concern people have is that if a parent can’t stop a child from crying or misbehaving it’s perceived as some evidence of bad parenting, or a lack of caring. Kids cry and sometimes they just won’t stop no matter what a parent does -

Well, it’s society. You choose to take part in society and as as consequence that means having to accommodate children and babies - as much as a ‘parent may have chosen to have the kid’ - you also chose to get on the plane. No one guaranteed you a quiet or easy flight.

It also causes a domino effect because now the people who sit under that storage bin have to look / store their stuff somewhere else too. And so on.  It’s utter chaos.  

Babies and kids have all the same rights to get on a plane as you.  If you don’t like it, you can take a car, train or ferry to get where you’re going.  Or video call.  

There it is - the perfect answer.

If sales stagnate - is a big ‘if’, in a world where it seems car buyers are increasingly seeing 7 and 8 year car loans at high interest rates as not only ‘to be expected’, but quite reasonable as well.

Appreciate the thoughtful response, and I don’t disagree about the ultimate conclusion - there’s no free pass here. Something needs to change because the bit shouldn’t have aired with that tattoo on the guys arm. Whether that’s better training for the editors and producers, or churning out episodes less frequently,

The Wrangler is just a sports car for outdoorsy people - or people who like to think they’re outdoorsy.

These all seem pretty predictable and obvious. The bigger the car, the more they can, generally haul.

Yep - it is. I was actually surprised when I learned you don’t have to refinance in the States.

Wait. What? Let’s break this down into simple sentences.

Holy shit - do you people even read what you’re responding to before hitting ‘publish’? Or do you just rage comment in some sort of unthinking Pavlovian response?

That’s “literally” not what was I arguing.