It isn't, though

Oh, we’re canceling video games now. Ok, I’m woke.

I wish I had the 12 minutes I spent reading this piece back.

Its really not that terrible, especially if you have game pass. Give it a try, its a few hours of fun.

I downloaded from the game pass, wife and I played it and beat it, we both enjoyed it.

If the game had ended before that third twist (and it definitely has a moment where you think it is ending there) I probably would have left feeling pretty positive about it but hooboy that whole final sequence made me hate the whole thing.

I thoroughly enjoyed the game. Trying the different outcomes had me stuck to my seat.  While there's different "official" endings the loops themselves can play out very different. I really enjoyed my time with the game.  I highly recommend. 

When a well respected YouTube channel buys 10 of your power supplies and 5 of them blow up under **standardized testing** the fault lies with YOU and not the “media” ..... NewEgg has a lot of apologizing to do also from cramming these DEFECTIVE power supplies down people’s throats just so they could get a damned…

Eh...I pretty much only bought their Mobos anyway. IDK about you, but when a company branches off into a new sector, I don't immediately buy that stuff. First couple releases are usually questionable. To the average person though, this won't even be a blip on their radar. (As others have said)

I’m something of a consultant in this field. This is 100% correct.

As someone certified in computer repair, it has been my overwhelming experience that “Joe Schmoe” tends to care more the price tag being cheap than the reviews when buying computer parts, especially those parts that aren’t (assumed to be) critical.

“The protection-features aren’t there to protect you or the PSU; they’re there for *marketing-purposes!* Your testing-methodology is wrong, if you expect the protection-features to actually work!”

Didn’t read the article, I wanted to take a shot at guessing what they said.

Not how this works. How’s it gonna go is, for the rest of his natural life, the minute anyone sees this dude within 500 feet of a Nintendo ROM, regardless of its provenance, he’s getting a new appointment in front of a very disappointed judge.

It’s not about proving that they don’t exist. Once destroyed, if he’s caught with a ROM again in any way, he’s in violation of a court order. Apparently then he could go to jail.

Look, I'm as pro-game preservation / emulation as a force for good where the industry constantly fails as anyone. But the difference here is that he charged access to stolen property, and if I remember right from the last set of articles, made a couple hundred thousand dollars doing so. This is not the grey area that…

Signing a legal deceleration that you’ve done something that you haven’t actually done is just going to put this dude in further legal jeopardy.

Well you’re wrong. That’s Nintendo’s property, being stolen and given away for free. There’s no ideological connection to the act. It’s to prevent resale and distribution, not to destroy. People can be so damn dramatic.

There are literally thousands of other sites hosting the same roms and the Internet Archive. It's going to be alright.