In the early version, you had the line at Niners -2. What gives?
16 idiots.
Sloppy? The CLink has turf. I know it's had some terrible games (like the Monday Night game against SF a few years ago), but it'd take outlier-level rain for it to be terrible conditions.
Uhh, Niners.
No he didn't: "He is definitely an over-meddler though, and has issued a number of strange decrees for footballing success, like the search for players with birthdates that include the number 8"
That .796 OPS is 12 percent above the league average, which is good for tough defensive positions. And he had an isolated slugging percentage of above .100, so he had a fair amount of power. Also, he had an OBP over .400 times.
People don't like the Titans.
They root for frozen tundras. Or, they abandoned the Steelers when they abandoned Palin.
Read the first paragraph, howabout?
They're favored on the road. Don't be a jerk.
Saints Row IV ($30) [Live] Other DLC ($2)
Reuben, how do you feel about Advanced NFL Stats v. Pro Football Reference's win chart? I like PFR's, since it factors in team strength—it had the Ravens as 63% favorites before kickoff, which seems right, because Vikings. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/2013…
Well, I guess Vegas got it right. (Yes, I know lines aren't a prediction. Still, I was amused as I could be by a Seahawks loss.)
Read the first paragraph.
Because they're at home. Carroll's never won there, and the Niners are not a terrible team. (I'm a Seahawks fan, and I'd put money on the Hawks.)
What do you mean by magnified? The more current line is in bigger font for all the games.