Nobody here is making fun of her though?

He did, yes. Like, years before a bunch of alt-right people (there’s another distinction!) got him fired.

Sawyer apologized after they had been resurfaced. Pretty big distinction.

It’s not like she’s only socially conservative, either.

She straight up uses a man’s name on her post-Potter books. But that happened after we all knew she was shitty in this particular way, so expecting better seems a bit silly.

She’s not part of the left. Hating trans people isn’t the only reason she campaigned so hard against Corbyn.

The NHL didn’t say they were going to do it at Disney.

Right, and the reason this would not be a character based on an existing character is so there would be no royalties. That’s the loophole.

Stupid, but true: It won’t be another character created in the past few decades because then they’d have to pay royalties to the creator. There’s a reason half the characters get a “created by” credit at the end of each episode of Harley Quinn but the others don’t, you know.

So you’re not a Democrat?

See? You’re still not listening. It’s not about what was said, no matter how many times you repeat yourself, refusing to accept what others have to say. The reason why what was said is an issue is the context in which it was said, a context which you continue to ignore.

Joe Biden is a Democrat. Brett Kavanaugh is a Republican. They’ve both been equally credibly accused of rape. There is no mechanism for Democrats could “force” Biden to “step down”, particularly since he has no position to step down from. I’m not a Republican, but it seems that you being a Democrat is clouding your…

That’s not my stance, no.

Nobody said you’re dumb.

Nobody said it is a good way to convince people. If you’re not getting it, you’re likely simply incapable of doing so. That’s the point being made by saying that.

This isn’t about what was said, it’s about how it was presented. You’re really not listening to me. Why not?

No, I’m not trolling. I genuinely want to know what your point was. It genuinely seems to just be about relitigating the primary.

Keeping in mind that this process resulted in Kavanaugh being confirmed, why are you insisting on it being used again for Biden?

Not everyone accused of rape is a rapist. 

What was your point exactly? It just seems to be relitigating the primary for some reason even though your guy won. Was there something else you were trying to say?