You think there is an objective standard as to what constitutes being rich and that this standard exists in nature itself.

You think having a system of laws in place that allows for killing hundreds of thousands of brown people who live far away is Good, Actually.

If you think keeping the system that allowed Bush to kill hundreds of thousands of people in place is more important that the lives of the hundreds of thousands of people he killed, you’re fucking up.

Imperiling the constitutional fabric of a republic that could place people like Bush in charge is the positive outcome of the Trump presidency, you fucking simpleton.

This makes literally no sense.

You’re the one saying this standard exists.

“Certainly a lot of what was leaked was wrong, heinous, even, but”

Maybe if you read the rest of the post, you’ll find out!

“The government recognizes certain actions as protected whistleblowing”

The message is “the donor class are switching to Warren, so now it’s okay to back her because that makes her the person most capable of defeating Sanders”.

Uh, it already happened this cycle! There was a new record set for total number of donors to a single candidate and was set by the candidate who raised the highest total amount of money this past quarter. The average donation given to that candidate is under $20 and none of their donors are billionaires.

Like, you know George Wallace was a Democrat too, right?

But they’re... not opening an investigation??? It’s an audit of a long-closed investigation that already happened.

Hm, if your objective standard for rich is dependant on other people, that seems like it’s pretty subjective!

It sucks when things are framed in a way that explicitly and deliberately ignores my very existence.

Ah yes, “special interests”, that’s who’s coming after Biden. “Special interests” like not wanting to die.

“objectively rich” lmao

Taxidiot1976

You sure do hate women who say things you disagree with!

Who said anything about humans?