Yes, let’s say the EU wanted an American prosecutor fired and a Warsaw Pact government official arranged to have it happen. How do you think the hashtag resistance would feel about this sort of meddling?

And why did you express this position in reply to what I said?

So, keeping in mind that your math was off by a factor of three, what’s your point?

How does it save money? There’s still the same amount of product. If anything, switching had upfront costs that just trudging along doing the same thing did not.

You’re right, these are pretty self-evidently a lot more appealing to kids than a Barbie. Good point!

What? Two thirds of that three quarters didn’t vote for anybody.

All the pieces in this nth-dimensional chess game are already on the board!

That it doesn’t distinguish him from any other famous wealthy kids is the fucking point!

Maybe, but imagine how the very same people would be reacting if a high-ranking official in a foreign government (let’s picture one from a former Soviet Socialist Republic) got an American prosecutor fired.

I love, love, love seeing these dorks break out the “you did a logical fallacy!!!” like they’re a dime store Ben Shapiro. Makes my fucking day.

Literally have not seen one person that can reasonably be categorized as on the left say anything like this. Lots of centrist doofuses, though!

“objectively rich”

Ah yes, famous opponents of nepotism, Fox News.

That just means that nearly three in four American adults didn’t vote for Trump in 2016.

Pelosi already seems to think they can’t indict him for anything, what with her plan to pass a law that would allow future presidents to be indicted (say, for being critical of Amazon, perhaps?) even though you actually can indict sitting presidents under the actual current state of the law.

It’s less that it’s not easy for people to understand, it’s more that the easy version of understanding it goes something like this:

“objectively rich” lmao

Again, saying that that Corbyn would prefer the UK not be in the EU makes him a “Brexiteer”, except spelling it wrong this time, is like saying Sanders and Trump are the same because they both object to seeing homeless people living on the streets.

Again, I didn’t mention pronouns. You’re very, very upset that someone on the computer said a thing you didn’t like two years ago and it’s making you imagine more things to get mad about. Log off, boomer. You’ll be happier.

I didn’t say anything about pronouns??? I didn’t whine or cry about anything??? The fuck outta here, snowflake.