I cannot afford a $10 lunch. That alone demonstrates that “one can always afford $10/lunch” is not true.

They’re at least analogous for you to censor both in the same way!

There’s multiple people in the comments on this very article calling people that.

So you’re just being pragmatic, is that it? You don’t think will cost her enough votes, so it’s fine to do not just for her, but for you, too?

“Ah, see, leftists say I am wrong, therefore I must be right.”

“Maybe it’s better to not waste our time getting outraged over petty shit and save for the real issues?”

You see, the trolls are all in competition with each other.

You think it’s bad to be woke and you think it’s a waste of time to be upset that presidential candidates laugh about slurs.

This is really the hill you are going to die on here in 2019.

Do not accept apologies from people who do not accept responsibility.

Such bullshit shouldn’t be accepted in a general election, either!

Yeah, I have no doubt that this is also what Warren voters actually believe. No purity tests for you, just one drop rule DNA tests!

How did you mean it, then? Spell it out. What other types of slurs do you use when “it all boils over”?

“But what if I call ONLY Obama the n-word?”

This is what Kamala Harris voters actually believe.

That doesn’t really make it “okay”.

You can describe someone who uses slurs without introducing new ones to the mix.

That’s not even the correct local pronunciation! (That’s Tronno.)

Wait, do people really just call it “Toronto”? As someone who lives here and is bombarded with the TIFF branding every year, this seems bizarre to me.

Polling that’s within three percentage points of the result is pretty fucking accurate! Why would you link to this as if it proves your point rather than disproves it?