“free money”

Yes, you’ve been using an ever-increasing amount of your time to complain about this article.

Do you genuinely believe that the consent you have to live on US soil derives from conquest?

Unlike, say, the US in the 1980s where homosexuality was unquestionably accepted, which allowed HIV to flourish. Checks out!

Said the person taking the time to repeatedly comment on this article.

That’s genuinely not even a sentence.

You know this article, unlike your comment, wasn’t written during spare time, right?

I just want you to confirm your position for me. Do you genuinely believe that the consent you have to live on US soil derives from conquest?

What’s your point then? That Cuba isn’t better than the US at management of HIV because it has fewer cases than the US? What is your actual position here?

Said the person taking the time to comment on said article.

He’s not campaigning with her, she’s campaigning for him.

Wait, your actual real argument as to why eradication of mother to child HIV transmission is not really a big deal is that HIV is already significantly less common in Cuba than in the US and that it’s “a disease of gay and bisexual men”?

So the consent you have to live on US soil derives from conquest, something that is now literally a war crime that is a violation of international law? Is that really what you want to go with here?

No.

I did not, in fact, vote for Trump.

Who gave the US permission to control who gets to cross its pretend borders?

Cuba is literally the only country in the world where there are no babies born with HIV anymore, thanks for asking!

No, I am not.

So?

If they were worried about anyone doing that, they’d be doing something to prevent it from happening. But they’re not, because they know that in 2016, even Bernie Sanders’ most hardcore supporters were just as likely to be loyal to the party as primary losers are in most election cycles.