Both these debates are scheduled for months before any primaries, you idiot.

The arbitrary lines on a map are called political boundaries. Did you really not know this?

They’re literally about who is or is not allowed to cross the political boundaries of nation states, lmao.

Your trolling has gotten much, much lazier since the website you take marching orders went down.

Might have something to do with who published it in the first place!

Statistically, more people were deported from the U.S. during the administration of President Barack Obama than during that of any other president.

You don’t think laws are political.

He’s not even a tech bro, he’s a sports bro! Before he was the politics numbers guy, he was the baseball numbers guy. Until it got transferred to ABC News last year, FiveThirtyEight was literally owned by ESPN! ESPN!!!

You don’t think laws are political, lmao.

So you support, unreservedly, the deliberate commission of an act of violence to create public fear through the suffering of the victims in the furtherance of a political or social agenda.

Do you support the actions of ICE?

I’m an internationalist, so I don’t believe in open borders, I believe in border abolition. Hope this clears things up!

You can’t just delete it after pasting, you have to delete it before you paste it. So paste it somewhere else, delete it, copy the new clean URL, and paste that here. Like so:

How was I supposed to know you thought your own idea was implausible?

“The deliberate commission of an act of violence to create public fear through the suffering of the victims in the furtherance of a political or social agenda.”

You think “an expansion of the police state” where “law enforcement at the federal level [plays] a more active role in” “significant restrictions on what constitute legal firearms” is “a necessary tactical component” of a “plausible strategy for confronting white nationalism and the white nationalist terrorist threat”.

You think “an expansion of the police state” where “law enforcement at the federal level [plays] a more active role in” “significant restrictions on what constitute legal firearms” is a “plausible strategy for confronting white nationalism and the white nationalist terrorist threat”.

You think cops taking people’s guns away is a feasible solution to white supremacy. Okay!

“Well, Actually, you’re more likely to be hit by a car than to be forced to watch Louis CK jerk off and then have his agent send you veiled threats until you leave the industry.”

You name one of “the solutions that [you] would consider putting forth”.