So, uh... how do you see where you’re going? Unless you have stalk eyes like a snail, that low roof won’t let your head stick up high enough to actually see over the dash.
So, uh... how do you see where you’re going? Unless you have stalk eyes like a snail, that low roof won’t let your head stick up high enough to actually see over the dash.
It’s not an ordinary crossover - that’s proved by the fact that it made the trip. Ironically, it seems closer to a proper 4x4 dressed up to look like a crossover for some reason.
My first thought as well! The Defender’s thing was always looking like a vintage Land Rover. Now it looks like 2005 “vintage”.
I mean, driving around alone is a decent way to have some fun while self-isolating (as long as you don’t stop and talk to anyone).
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
It’s better, but the rest of the car needs the same treatment too. It doesn’t match if it’s just the rear.
Well said. I hate to be one of those people who says “they don’t make ‘em like they used to”, but IMO, car interior design peaked in the mid-2000s, at the end of the button and knob era but before screens took over.
In this case, it seems boring is a good thing.
I’ve been against touchscreens in cars for a long time, and this only strengthens my resolve. Everything in a car should be operable by buttons and knobs that can be identified and used without looking at them.
$3000 of profit... golly, that’s enough for five more Moab projects!