Mr. Obvious here. If Apple complies. It will lose me along with millions of other Apple consumers. (Those of you with shares may wanna start selling) But if this precedent is set, there will be no limit on any company forking over such sensitive data. A “back door” will become common place for most Corporations if…

Monica’s first dress? I’m sure she’s proud of those stains.

one upping your page title..

Fair March

Hate to bring this up... to go ahead and tell you. Most of you are likely “white” as well. Many think that just a coincidence too :/

You know what I find harder to understand? Why are “we” adding more “victimless” crime offenders behind bars??? As if prisons and jails weren’t already filled with them in “MERICA” already. I officially live in a country where a cop can murder someone “Scott Free” yet someone can go to jail over a couple sentences…

Not exactly the first time an experiment with a detached head... Google search for “Russian Zombie Dog experiment” (warning: very graphic and heart-tugging)

According to majority in here. Ur better off Not blocking. Instead just skip to the restraining order. Then maybe you can throw me in jail for years over some sentences posted on the “Internet”. Somewhere far away from my actual physical being.. That’s the future...

Courts and judges and anything in law have a hard time regulating to any social media platforms that is exist because of “freedom”. This case shoulda been thrown out because someone forgot to block someone, simply stated. Was contact made yes. But The “victim” should have set a perverbial (restraining order) by…

You know what I find “funny” about this story... To think someone had the “wherewithal” to place a restraining order against someone but not even have them blocked first. When usually one would block someone WAY before ever arriving at “restraining order”. Then “conveniently” said “victim” goes to court for…

What’s the point in getting a restraining order against someone through the courts and then (potentially on purpose) “not block them” socially On any internet medium? You see the victim being the person who enforced the restraining order... I don’t really have a bias in this. Who's the real victim?

You’re “implying” that’s someone rights need to get circumvented because of a “notification”? Literally... And you think I’m the wrong one.

And there’s also a thing called “blocking” on FB... It's Very useful and I highly recommend it

I’m arguing about the president being set on “social media/internet” through courts on any “privacy” issues. Limits are “revenge porn stuff”, which I’m all for when it comes to laws against that.. But why do courts have to get involved on ppl having “bad history” together. If Internet represents freedom of speech.…

Why shouldn’t it be? Alil thing called privacy rights. Or do you enjoy often circumventing those too?

Gravity’s impact is “extremely small” on electrons. Maybe Black holes don’t effect electrons as much?Atleast that’s how I make sense of it. Could be wrong