It’s Haldex. Transverse 4 so Haldex AWD. True Quattro is only in the longitudinal engines from what I understand. But they still brand the car “Quattro”
It’s Haldex. Transverse 4 so Haldex AWD. True Quattro is only in the longitudinal engines from what I understand. But they still brand the car “Quattro”
This is actually a really well equipped car at a decent price. I would’ve considered it for sure. It’s got what I want, basically the black optic package, the LED lights, and the premium stereo, and a manual. Perfectly equipped A4.
Good to have someone around who knows how to “host” a thing like this, just to keep the flow. Wouldn’t be surprised if he’s there to kind of mentor LeBron on hosting. (Also, token white guy the target demo likes)
Yeah, I seriously can’t see anyone saying a bad thing about Halle Berry. I mean, 51 and DAMN.
This is the correct take. Keep your rings, watches, abrasive clothing, and dry ass hands off the cars.
lol I didn’t take it that way, more an indictment of my age I guess, that these yutes might be oblivious to something as important as Dukes of Hazzard.
I’m not suggesting it to be delicate, I’m suggesting it cause they’re “salt of the earth” types. You know, morons.
Eh? Everyone should know who the Dukes of Hazzard are, at least in my little world.
Well, it’s not about fee-fees, it’s about using terminology folks can get behind even if they have limited mental capacities. A good example of this is people who despise “Obamacare” but are big fans of the Affordable Care Act.
As long as they are putting children in cages, um, yeah.
I think that’s what a lot of Germans said right before their country started imprisoning folks and separating parents and children...
I really think we need to change the terminology of white privilege. I agree it is something that exists. But the way it’s phrased isn’t doing it any favors. For example, as a straight, tall, relatively non-offense looking white male, I don’t “feel” like I’m getting benefits per se. I just feel regular old…
I weep for the future when we need to elaborate on references like this.
You may be right! I don’t think this is something he’ll ever be able to live down or escape. But, I don’t think we should be boarding the internet outrage train over him trying? Should we?
too soon
Off-white in general is all about the deconstructed “I forgot to sew that” look.
Sorry, my reply wasn’t clear. I meant your assumption that it doesn’t seem like he’s doing anything to earn forgiveness was not unreasonable. I haven’t really seen or heard anything one way or the other, so you certainly aren’t wrong. He may still be a complete fucking asshole abuser who deserves nothing but a kick in…
Those seem like fine answers, though number 7 is perhaps worded weird? I don’t know. It’s not like he made money BECAUSE he was assaulting women. The money didn’t come from hurting people. The hurting people came because he had money...? I don’t know the specifics. But I mean, he’s Louis C.K, the “fame” of who you are…
now who’s ignoring context? I’m not talking about stopping a car, I’m talking about wronging someone, and the amount of time required for rehabilitation or forgiveness being set to infinity as perhaps unreasonable. Are some things unforgivable? Yes. Is what he did unforgivable? For the women he wronged, absolutely.…
I mean, isn’t he entitled to do any job people will pay him for? No one is being forced to pay the guy. (Though the unannounced show isn’t cool, because some people really will want to boycott him, and they absolutely have the right to do so.)