I know the full review (and murder threats/swatting/doxxing) is coming later, but I’m curious what the first thoughts are from people on staff. Is it fun? Is it worth diving in right away, or should I get through my backlog first? Are there a lot of rough edges? Would love to hear what people think.

Better than the conservative utopia where you just get shot on sight. Oh wait, he's white.....

Airsoft guns haven’t been legal in NYC in a while. Kid was an idiot. He’s white though, so he’ll get off with a slap on the wrist.

Yep, there’s been nothing gun related in the news lately that would cause this kind of concern. Nothing at all. Nope. Not a thing.

And games would remain broken at launch. And never fixed. Like so many were in the cartridge days.

Day one patches are common because games are exponentially more complex than they were back when patches weren’t a thing.

Why do you feel sorry for the dealership? They were allegedly assholes to this customer and the will lose future business because of it.

Can those jorts on that dude in the top image possibly get any tighter? I bet the front looks like he’s smuggling grapes.

People driving around unbuckled are common because they can do it. If the ability to operate a vehicle was non-existent unless your belt was fastened there would be no people unbuckled.

And they’d be buggy as shit or we’d get fewer games.

Naw they probably already had most of those changes in the works a few months before submitting their game for certification. The last month was likely just them finishing up testing for those features and the features themselves were already complete for the most part. They just didn't want to chance botching the…

LOL at that point they’re normally referred to as “welfare cheats”.

Why is it better for someone who once wielded power over others, and probably will do so again, to be a vacuous, disingenuous, amoral shithead 100 percent of the time rather than only 99 percent?

The problem is, he doesn’t say he’s anti-abortion, he says he’s pro-life. But then he’s in support of the death penalty. So he clearly does not stick to his convictions and is inconsistent on the matter of whether “life” is to be protected at all costs.

Easy for him to say. He won’t be the one going through the heartbreak of having a child with microcephaly.

“If I’m going to err, I’m going to err on the side of life,” he said.

I’m guessing he’s going to err on the side of life, but not err on the side of making sure women who are forced to have babies with birth defects are then provided with the medical and financial resources necessary to care for a child with life-long special needs.