If the rope is twice as long they’re lynched twice as much. That’s just math.

It’s per se, and you’re using it kind of weirdly. It means roughly the same thing as “as such” or “in and of itself”.

My recollection is that she said he called her about the song but she didn’t hear the half of the lyric where he says “I made that bitch famous,” and the video seems to confirm her version (assuming that if the video did show that it would have been included in the released version). The line she did hear isn’t really…

“Yes, she was shady in how she lied about not having talked to Kanye.”

Cómo, not comó.

“Sessions should be enforcing the laws set forth by Congress not his personal agenda against legal use of marijuana.”

Also anyone who lives with them, and sometimes neighbors, depending on the setup and how often the carrier makes mistakes (basically half my mail goes to my neighbors’ mail).

Misdirected mail has a nearly negligible chance of ending up in the hands of someone who will misuse the information, but someone who calls in to get data could be an identity thief.

Whether it’s “gold-digging” depends on whether the money was put into his possession and not whether it’s his?

I don’t see what do surprising. I’m pretty sure “people care about Taylor Swift’s feuds” and “people who can play Mean Girls entirely in their head from memory” are basically the same group.

Everything you wrote is probably correct, though some legal scholars argue otherwise.

But she’s a citizen from birth, right? The argument that “natural born citizen” means born in the US, and not a citizen from birth, is not widely accepted and is probably incorrect, and it would rule out several people who have been serious candidates and generally believed to be eligible.

I haven’t been following this at all but through osmosis what I thought happened was there was a stir about the lyrics and Swift said she knew about the part about “might still have sex” but not “I made that bitch famous”, then after that they released a video about her hearing the first line, like she said, but not…

The first time I heard a complaint vaguely along these lines was when a friend that complained about black extras in the Lord of the Ring movies because “black people didn’t exist back then”. I was too confused by all the flaws in reasoning and just how many of them there were I didn’t even know how to formulate a…

Why shouldn’t there be an amber alert when one parent is kidnapping a child and might be on their way to another country or something?

English spelling wasn’t really standardized in 1810.

“This nonsense is why I advocate that Amber Alerts shouldn’t be issued unless BOTH parents do not know where the kid is”

Why is one speculative motive with no evidence better than another?

“If someone had said the same thing about Obama we would have wanted the secret service to interview them”

Did the police also hunt down and kill their families? If not, weak!