I didn't care for the choice of wording, "I made love to the king". More like, I laid there and let the king do me. It's not like they had a romantic interlude.

Agreed, Jamie's was horrifying enough but to show a child was too much for me.

"I must admit that I don’t fully understand the opening scene of the episode."
When Claire's 1950's daughter asked about the heron/crane, it then turns from a picture to one flying overhead like a stork would delivering a baby. I think that was the reference.
So sad.
Claire holding her baby girl completely undid me,…

OOPS! BUG. But then again we may be seeing that too.

Agreed. I expected she would have seen the same look about the ribbon selling boy as the young man from season one chained in the basement. Same white skin, red ringed eyes, creepy stare.

There also may be more to him than meets the eye. Why would he so easily believe the unbelievable then follow it so fervently? What in his past makes him so fixed on this? It feels more than just tenacious detective work. Behind his impassive face may be a personal driving force, some type of animosity.

I have a feeling, knowing this show, that Vanessa and John Claire's past relationship will not have ended nicely. Something bad we are about to find out.

Not the puppy you ba$tards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Renfield's but eating was perfect!

They were hauling a$$ and did the corner on two wheels!!!!!!! Claire as the OG in France.

Haha Black Jack skewered in the weewee!!!!!!!!!!!! That's more than you deserve you effing creep! Especially after I don't even want to think about poor little Fergus, our adorable adopted urchin. I'm hoping Jamie showed up and intervened before….anything. I can't.