Yeah...I also feel like generally teenage girls don't need to be told to count calories, or go into bars with drunk adult men.

This is a false flag by /whichever agency/, probably NSA or something.

!!!

Cute!

Hey, I have an instructional VHS from that same linedancing teacher. Not the hip hop one though :( That was too edgy and urban for me.

Hey 4chan dudes! I totally believe you now, it's isn't about sexism at all, it's just about money...

"First of all, only a truly clueless shitstain would try to sell the notion that having nude photographs of your own body invalidates your right to speak out about anything ever again."

Bitches need to Emma Watson-ify

To all of the people who were putting Emma Watson down yesterday for not bringing anything new to the table regarding feminism or for just giving basic "Feminism 101" in her speech -

"Which, coincidentally, is just slightly more than your pay for every man's dollar."

Germ isn't really a cutesy word; it's a synonym for microbe, bacterium, etc. When speaking to a large group of people with varied educational backgrounds and language abilities, it is usually best to stick with words they are going to be familiar with rather than confusing them or scaring them.

Just so we're clear: you can bring snacks on planes now, too.

It is, in fact, UNVELIEVEABLY IMPOLITE to call someone a stupid ugly fat cunt just because she clearly said "no thanks, I'm not interested. "

Cool. I like this.

I would like to hear your support, as someone who is not a woman turning down dates online, that "most dudes are ok with it". Just because you might be does not mean most men are.

!!!! "reverse-sexism" - I think we can all disengage now, it's a lost cause. :)

Sooo... you didn't read a single thing any person said, I guess? Just gonna ignore all the women pointing out that men insult/assault them after saying no? Cool, cool. Glad you GUESS you would agree despite not even bothering to listen to what the issue is.

Because, obviously from your response, you are one of these guys who simply refuses to take a woman's word for it. I just read dozens of coherent, rational, logical replies to your question and you decided to dismiss everything everyone said to you and restate your question.

Then why do you presume a woman who doesn't respond individually to 50+ messages from men she is not interested on a daily basis is dishonest? You are not owed a response because you sent me a message that says "Hi ur hot" (or even if you sent me something more intelligent than that).

I'm having a great idea for a TV show right now. Basically, women who receive threatening/abusive messages from a dude on dating sites submit the guy's profile to the show, who then lure the guy into a date with a fake profile. When the guy shows up for the date, rather than the way-out-of-his-league woman he was…