What are the odds that private planes and airfields won’t find themselves under quite the same scrutiny?

Like what do they expect will happen if people are pulled over?

To make the claim of believing in the “right to Life”, one would HAVE to be against guns and the death penalty. Also, I submit that they would have to have NUMEROUS adopted children. Show me the person who meets these criteria, and I will accept their claim. All the rest are shameless hypocrites.

I wonder how many people on board with this were the same people who lost their minds at the thought of a person tattling on another person for violating any COVID-19 restrictions.

Also, The Lilith Fund is an amazing name, though it probably has less to do with the mythology of Adam’s first wife and probably more to…

Brought to you by the people who wept in fear and anger of the idea of enforcing ANYTHING that had to do with stopping the spread of a deadly communicable disease, if even half-measures for a short period of time. 

They have to infantilize her, though, because otherwise they can’t justify making decisions for her.  And you can bet this won’t be the end of the decisions they make for her.

Well, they’re working on that. From the article:

It looks like it’s just trying to incentivize busybodies to sue people. So, e.g., an ex-boyfriend who wants to control his ex-girlfriend might sue someone who gave her a ride out of state because unborn baby.

Blatantly unconstitutional.

What we need is a law that forces line item costs detailing the amount of money spent defending these laws when the inevitable lawsuits come.

LOOK AT THE SMALL GOVERMENT! Seriously I can’t imagine the stupidity of the baseline republican or what they stand for at this point. 

Unfortunately, this is still not enough of a reason for some people to actually cast a vote. It’s their right to boycott a process they don’t agree with, but... I mean... c’mon.

Like many Republican policies, this only targets the poor. This wont affect those that can afford to fly out of state.

I don’t understand how this can be enforced. Are they planning on having checkpoints on the highway? Pulling over cars with women of child bearing age and forcing them to submit to pregnancy tests on the side of the road? Will they start doing the same thing at airports?

I don’t know exactly how close we are to state pregnancy registries and ankle monitors for “high risk” mothers, but I know that we are a hell of a lot closer than we should be.

Hope everyone understand the assignment come 2024.

The laws allow anyone to sue a person or organization they think has violated the ordinance, though the woman seeking the abortion would be exempt.

Good to see that this is being covered. Not like we’re going to see this story on CNN or MSNBC (aka TRUMP TV). Even CSpam would rather provide a platform to an insurrectionist than Biden’s press conference on lowering prescription drug prices

Forcing people to travel north via undergound means has historically always been Good Guy behavior.

The stock price is high at WB right now because Barbie made a mountain of cash, but the people who made that all possible are on strike now, the summer movie season officially ends on Monday, and WB doesn’t have much else in the pipeline, as proven by the fact that they’re delaying theatrical releases of completed…