I guess if I was about to turn 50 and my favorite team hadn’t won anything since I was taking my bologna sandwich and astronaut ice cream to elementary school in a brand new Scooby-Doo lunch box I might turn into a reprehensible yelling clown glommed onto by internet content dispersal mechanisms.

Eat, sleep, train.

Best Kotaku article I’ve ever read, along with a valuable life lesson.

The 3 most important words in this piece: “completely privately funded”.

But the thing is, if you’re not a Golden State Warriors fan—or, hell, even if you are one—and you claim that the blowout part of last night’s game held your attention as closely as the first half did, you’re lying.

Just out of curiosity what is K-State and/or Snyder’s record of pulling, or not renewing, scholarships between seasons because the player isn’t playing well, or was injured, the coach wanted to make room for a bigger-better-player, or for no reason whatsoever? Put another way, does he and K-State show the same loyalty…

Bingo. It’s a shitty ballpark. Citifield is MUCH nicer.

I believe the contention here is not that the system is good or bad per se, but that the current commander in chief doesn’t have a clue about what he is talking about, and to make such remarks off the cuff is disingenuous at best.  Furthermore, saying that the new system costs a lot and that you are not going to use…

But to be fair, the other article was criticizing the sinkability of the carrier, not how the planes were launched.

I’m not an expert on aircraft carrier catapult systems, so I’m not in a position to make any judgments on the merits of steam vs EMALS (e-mails?).

But the EMALS!

Isn’t that the whole point of democracy, if your boss is acting like a tool?

Setting my alarm for 530AM to get the full 4.5 hours of Kirk and Callahan on WEEI with the HOTTEST TAKES. It’s going to be great. You’ll get Sully from Carver with his “I have a black friend” take. You’ll get Ben from Manchester who once sat in the out field in Fenway in the 1980s and NEVER HEARD A RACIST COMMENT, so…

You’d be correct if he had been denied boarding. But he was not denied boarding, so you’re looking at the wrong section of the CoC. Section 21 “Refusal of Transport” is the relevant section once you’re on the plane and it does not list overbooking as a reason to remove a passenger from the plane

are you serious? . What they can do is offer more $$..everyone has a price. Someone else will take that $1000+ hotel. You can’t use force on a paying customer. He had a reason....What if your mom was dying and you had to fly home to see her? and the next flight out is not til the next day? C’mon man can’t blame the…

America is so fucked right now because the Government has turned the keys to the kingdom over to corporations.