I don’t think taxi regulations are necessarily good (they seem to be anti-competitive more than anything). But it accounts for some non-negligible differences in operating costs and whatnot, which Uber does not have to pay.

Since over 60 million Americans (out of some 320 million) are ages 0-14, that can’t be true.

Part of the price advantage surely comes from the unequal regulatory footing of ride hailing apps and taxi companies

especially a climactic research ship

It’s a two way street. If you want to withhold just positive credit info, I guess that’s fine (and pointless). But being able to withhold negative info defeats the purpose of credit.

It barely passes the cabover test, and the only mention was basically a self-referential joke, so no. Not peak Torch.

So, what if cars with Level 4 autonomy were exempt from insurance for the owner (while the manufacturer assumes all liability)? That would likely encourage adoption.

That’s one interpretation

*principal

The article title and body suggest the video offers more than it truly does. All you get from the video as far as evidence is that something is different. You can’t actually see that difference, despite what the article suggests.

Also, didn’t Putin do the exact same thing last year? Classic insecure dictator move to interject himself into prominent entertainment and sporting events and pretend like he knows what the fuck is going on

What are you talking about? Bernie loves Putin

Yeah but I bet your great grandfather was white

Trump would be proud

That Powell dunk was fucking righteous

He’ll always be EVO’s Chris Harris to me

Who do you think you are, Tavarish?

This is such bullshit and you know it

What the fuck does that mean?

Is match fixing more common in esports that tend to pay less? One of the reasons soccer/football match fixing is more common in poor countries is low compensation for athletes, which makes the illicit offers more appealing.