This particular study that I found on the FAA website by haphazard Googling strongly suggests that misinterpretation of flight data is the least common cause of human error in commercial aviation accidents

Human error in aircraft accidents is the opposite of rare; it is the most common cause. It is the opposite of a non-problem; it is the biggest problem in air travel safety today.

What do you think Microsoft makes?

There's a pun in there somewhere

But since when is a Toyota Corolla an SUV? I am so confuse

I'm not sure if the replies here affected it, but reverse GIS of the title image yields this:

Blame the movies and their exploding cars trope

What

I'm sorry for your experience. I want to make a few points relevant to people in your position. It's not meant to minimize what you went through.

I don't know how I feel about the XCAR guy. I think Chris Harris and Jethro Bovingdon would be a fairly winning combination.

What I meant is, states collect A dollars in the form of usage fees (gas tax, tolls, registration, etc.) and spend B dollars on roads maintenance and construction. In every state of which I am aware, B>A.

I'm not aware of a single state that collects enough in gas tax to cover the amount it spends on roads. Since money is fungible, by what rationale can it be said that gas taxes are robbed to pay for other programs?

Maybe the new UI is designed by JJ Abrams

Skeuomorphism has always been kind of shit, Apple was just one of the last software companies to figure it out

What the fuck how was that goal tending

It might sell as many copies as a brown diesel manual RWD station wagon

Is it better than a 991 Turbo S? I ask because the Turbo is often offered as a prime example of a livable supercar.

But you can't refuel an internal combustion vehicle at home. And for those who don't live in a single-family home, the cost and labor of constructing widespread parking structure-based charging stations is not insurmountable.