Perez Hilton was one of the people who apologized for his treatment of Britney Spears.

Her fans come up with every excuse... except for the obvious one, she's not well and they're not entitled to know the specifics. Her posting habits are basically identical to a number of mentally ill people I know, and no, all her issues aren't from the fact she was in a conservatorship. And Brit, you've had plenty of…

Instagram online showering is “thriving”?

Not a peep on Mason’s Torah portion. I’m disappointed. 

People, I thought this was Connie Britton. Anyone else see it?

It was inappropriate then too. I thought that was the joke. 

If you are checking your word against a list before entering it, you are taking the “game” too seriously.

I dunno personally.

No, it’s a painfully slow, embarrassing pace for a developed country and pretending it’s not only helps Republicans get away with suggesting that the results are tainted because it’s such a patently ridiculous position to defend the speed at which votes are counted in some states.

“Instagram model”

Only Prinsloo comes out looking good in this. Unless she is claiming some kind of strong arming here, I don’t see how she was “manipulated”. She wasn’t working for him. He has no direct power over her beyond his fame and it’s her choice to be blinded by his assholery or not. Stroh is 23, she knows what marriage is and…

“When the affair began, she said, “I was young, I was naive. And I mean, quite frankly, I feel exploited. I wasn’t in the scene like I am now. So I was definitely very easily manipulated.”

I get all that, it’s the “which she previously understood to be” part that hit me. It makes it sound like she was not involved in her care decisions at the time. Like they just knocked her out and told her a false story about it after the fact.

They say that if you listen closely, you can actually hear Peter Thiel opening his checkbook... 

What’s objectionable about that? Paraphrased, it’s just “You can hurt someone with something that seems small and trivial in ways you might not expect, so try to keep that in mind.” Seems reasonable to me.

You know what? Good for them.

Ain’t no rules says a dog puppet can’t insurrect the Capitol

Hey just because they’re a Disney employee doesn’t give you the right to call them a robot! There’s a very small but very real chance that they’re an every day, normal, regular person.

I’ve never benefited from larger  phones on Gizmodo. All the extra screen space is taken up by ads.

While I agree with not using “you guys” at work, I’m not sure it’s accurate to say “guys” only refers to men when every YouTube video starts with “Hi, guys!” or “Hey, you guys!” Are these channels directed only to men? If it hasn’t already, “guys” is rapidly becoming un-gendered.