any crimes, really. that’s what they did with jodi arias, too.

yeah, but what happens if they do end being people who would kidnap/hurt children? people would be calling for her head.

goodness, I’d hate to see what happens to you imagining a republican president, which is a much worse outcome.

See, I’m totally down with people saying “I’m bi!” and meaning “I like people who have genitals and feelings that are my identified gender, and those that are not!”

yeah, it’s not a conspiracy theory if it’s true. (which I realize is what all conspiracy theorists say, but .... really)

This is fine. Scotch tastes like tongue-fucking Mother Earth. The bourbon shortage is what worries me ...

oh my god, unclench

nah, it’s perfect if you read it as least to most wanted.

would it, though? the entire RNC despises cruz.

funny, considering how gung-ho you were a few comments up about ‘making life better for so many other people.’ it’s easy to take risks like that when you, personally, have nothing to lose.

it hasn’t gotten worse, we’re just talking about it publicly more. what part of that is so difficult for you to grasp?

It can be used as a silencing tactic by the more disingenuous, which is what ULH was saying, not that it’s that by default.

and yet, here we are, on a gawker site, reading an article about a black mass shooter ...

WOW

are you not aware of the concept of connotation? ‘to beat up’ (and all permutations) is used to describe a bullying situation, an unprovoked attack, an unequal balance of power. what she did was fight back, not beat someone up. you’re being deliberately obtuse.

there’s a difference between advocating for teaching girls self-defense and saying, when someone is assaulted, ‘why didn’t she learn self-defense?’ one of those is good advice, one is victim-blaming. I’m sorry you’re intellectually unable to discern the difference.

this, thank you. good comparison, especially considering the fact that the false accusations for robbery are pretty much exactly on par with false accusations for rape, but only one of them receives extra scrutiny. wonder why!

So far more women haven’t come out of the woodwork to accuse Luke of being anything more than an asshole.

yes; it’s an ‘and’ situation. as in, she’s qualified and will, as a woman (and as her history indicates), support pro-woman legislature. some people are willfully obtuse.

and neither can sanders, despite holding some sort of elected office since 1980.