No I don’t. And I’m proud of the country that is full of people that are capable of procuring their own means of providing themselves water instead of being dependent on the government to coddle them through their lives. Give a man a fish, teach a man to fish. Which would you prefer?

I didn’t say anybody said nestle should provide water. I’m saying that the phrae, “water is a human right” is wrong. Because for something in our country to be a right, the government either has to provide it, or protect it. It’s not the government job to say that I can or cannot have water. I get it for myself.…

I’m not saying it’s not a need. I’m saying its no one else’s job to provide it to you.

Everyone here that says water is a human right is arguing for a guarantee of success.. You have the right to be born and live. Giving someone food and water to stay alive is attempting to guarantee success. It doesn't work like that. You want water? Either pay for it, or collect it yourself. It's no one else's job to…

Bull shit. Ever heard of collecting rain water? Bottled water is not the only way to obtain water. They're not infringing on anyone's right by bottling it and selling it. They're providing a convenience.

Nope. No one HAS to provide you with air, it just happens to be available everywhere you go. A right is something that the government does not infringe on or has to provide. You have a right to freedom of speech. You have a right to not have to quarter soldiers. You have a right to a speedy trial by a jury of your…

No it's not. No one has the provide you the elements you need to survive. No one but yourself. You do not have a guarantee of success, whether it's life, your pursuit of happiness or otherwise.

A basic human right? Wow. You guys can take something as simple as bottle water and turn it into some bull-shit bleeding-heart liberal human rights cause. Giz has gone so far downhill recently it's appalling.

I've been wondering if there really needs to be one.

I’ll add “Retina” because the moniker is entirely meaningless. I had this conversation a million times when I used to sell phones when the “Retina” craze first started to take effect.

Phablet.

I wouldn't hold ping against someone more than pong. Pong I'm thinking of a video game. I think ping makes more senses because if you say, PNG it kind of sounds like ping. More so than pong.

Well the market for this electric bike just keeps getting smaller doesn't it?

I ask this out of sheer curiosity. Who is not able to obtain a drivers license, aside from the blind, in which case, a bike is of no value? You don't even have to be a citizen to get a drivers license.

Well that's an astonishingly small market for an electric bicycle. People that can't get a drivers license.

Well if roughly $25 is gonna kill you, why would you spend $1,600 on a bicycle?

Insurance for one of these bikes is really cheap and in most states you can register it as an antique for way cheaper than a modern vehicle. I believe it's $25 in Utah.

First of all, value matters to about 99% of consumers, if not 100%. And people judge value based on what they're familiar with. Nearly everyone has a car, and has to purchase tires for it. Of course I'm arguing something based on personal opinion, doesn't mean my opinion by default is wrong. I'm just offering my…

Forget the lifted area, it's great and all, but the surrounding mountain bike area ALONE are worth the trip. 5 minute ride away from the lifts there are TONS of trails around a lake, we must've ridden a trail called "The Grand Wazoo" probably 30-40 times in the few days we were there. Went there about 2 years ago…

The problem with electric bikes? I think the major issue is that they do 2 things in mediocre fashion. They don’t do one thing great, just ok. It’s not really fantastic as a bicycle, and it’s not really that great as a long distance traveler. But really, the biggest problem with electric bicycles?