It already is a thing, and quite unfair. Differs from state to state, even within cities.

I just would like to know, what gun is not designed to kill, and by definition kill people.

Thanks. That is a refreshing view. I think its from that starting point that we can have rational conversations about where to go. We all need to recognize that both sides have differences in opinion but care about reducing deaths, one side is urging caution on losing constitutional protection of inalienable rights…

Not exactly but definitely close(thanks for the respectful response), that poll was before the American public had a chance to dig through the fact about the assault weapons ban. One major fact being there is no such thing as an assault weapon. Except in some states the StreetSweeper shotgun is declared an assault…

What narrow constituency are you talking about? Are you talking about me? Or are you talking about the majority of non-coastal Americans?

I would say one small thing eoghan, Not many people on the right and center are in favor of “gun control”. Most people are in favor of well written, rational policies, like a well written red flag law, that does not unjustly strip an individual of their constitutional rights without a court opinion first. I would not…

No. It does not. Though I know you are trolling, I will respond with the proper name. It stands for Armalite.

Actually, an AR-15 patterned rifle available in the civilian market is not a military weapon, neither is it an assault weapon as an assault weapon is generally defined as have fully automatic or burst select fire capability.

That is an extremely disingenuous argument. AR-15's are a common use firearms and account for less than 2% of Gun Deaths yearly. Mass Shootings have seen the usage of a variety of different types of firearms. In countries where firearms are not available Mass Knifings are a problem, albeit not as big of a problem as…