xargle
xargle
xargle

not really, the precedent is clear, the queen signs whatever the prime minister asks her to in his role as head of the democratically elected government, to refuse would change the situation from the PM trying to subvert democracy to the queen trying to subvert democracy, as it stands there are legal challenges that

there going to be a constitutional crisis, thats pretty much certain, but if she didnt sign the progogation order she would effectively be taking a side and possibly risking being forced to abdicate, depending on the fallout, by allowing it she essentially hands off responsibility for dealing with johnson to the

there going to be a constitutional crisis, thats pretty much certain, but if she didnt sign the progogation order she would effectively be taking a side and possibly risking being forced to abdicate, depending on the fallout, by allowing it she essentially hands off responsibility for dealing with johnson to the

one of the problems is that the EU has never been willing to negotiate in good faith and has been seeking the economic punishment of britain from the begining, their objective has always been to either achieve a brexit so soft that the only thing that really changes is that the UK no longer has seats in brussels or so

yeah although to be fair the irish are being a bit stupid at this point as well, if I were the irish prime minister I would be screaming at this point to drop the fucking backstop, because if it doesnt go no deal will pass parliament, and if there is a NO DEAL brexit then the hard border that the backstop is meant to

it isnt really, unemployment is low, housing is a bigger issue, the chances of anybody under 25-35 owning their own home anywhere south of birmingham is the lowest its been in 50 years but thats as much due to the complete failure to replace social housing stock since the late 70s as anything else.

its a lot more complicated than that, there are genuine not racist issues with the EU that do present perfectly valid reasons for leaving.

I think the issue is that in some ways animals particularly like pets are in a category with children.

on the bright side in that respect Sir Kims career isnt being cut short by much, he has been in the UK diplomatic service for 42 years and was due to leave his post in december anyway, and it sounds very much like the FO is determined to find him another role somewhere, partly because he is considered to be well liked

even if it did the child was still in the detention center for weeks with the infection and her mother seeking medical care.

you are missing the point, the child got sick in a detention center, the child then over the course of several weeks got progressively worse as her condition was repeatedly ignored despite the mother repeatedly trying to get her treated. That should not happen, there was a duty of care it was not met, the

dude you started the thread by going ‘fuck her’ about a grieving mother, whose child died as a result of medical neglect, a certain amount of hostility is to be expected.

and the child still caught the infection while in custody, and still received care far below what would be the minimum standard in any prison in the western hemisphere let alone that which should be expected in a facility holding minors.

how?

sorry but people did refer to camps other than the german extermination camps as concentration camps, accurately, so no you dont get to whine and complain about AOC using the words correctly., the right has been trying to distract from the fucking issue by basically saying you cant call our concentration camps

ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn

whats really interesting in this discussion is not really trumps reaction, petulance and a tantrum, pretty much as expected and not really doing a whole lot to disprove the ambassadors statements.

ireland should indeed be united but its kind of hard to get them to give up on their silly ‘republic’ idea...

they wont, offically Hunt and May have to publically state that they disagree with the ambassadors assessment - they dont- but Hunt has said that that kind of candid assessment is a ambassadors job and that they are certainly not going to be taking disciplinary action against the ambassador, although given the

thats not how it works, it was never how it works, one of the conditions of purchase of the weapons was complete command authority over them.