“Buying a government office isn’t just limited to ambassadorships anymore.”

“These kinds of items create the most profit anyway.”

Have you ever been to the Staples Center Period? Attended an MLS game (or any event at StubHub Stadium for that matter)? Been to a Regal cinemas? Did you watch Michael Jackson’s This Is It (you really should if you haven’t. It’s awesome.). How about the movie ‘Holes’, ‘Ray’ or any of the Chronicles of Narnia? And…

To be fair, Anschutz’ empire is so incredibly massive that you can’t realistically expect a “socially-compassionate” person to avoid his businesses.

He’s absolutely taking him seriously. So are the countless people that’ve been shouting this within the beltway for over a decade. The Triad is at serious risk of being rendered useless against peer states. It needs to be updated, and we need to make sure those updates include the requirements to beat the counter-ICBM…

“That’s quite a leap of interpretation”

“UNTIL THE WORLD COMES TO ITS SENSES... regarding nukes”

The Trident D5 is the most up to date, and thankfully the largest, portion of the triad. Unfortunately, it’s a response weapon, not a first strike. Now let’s looks at the other two thirds:

“Do not blame people for taking him at his word just because he’s too stupid to state an idea clearly.”

You’re probably right. Your argument’s very convincing.

You seem to be a bit lost on the subject. Allow me to help you out here. The Triad is a deterrent. If it’s ability to deliver is lost because an adversary has come up with a means of rendering it ineffective (like Russia just tested last Friday), is it still a deterrent to those adversaries? No, of course not. That’s…

You weren’t dumb enough to make that first comment, get corrected, and then NOT look up the SecDef nominee, right?

I’m afraid you’re wrong here. His Tweet is completely accurate. 2/3rds of the Triad is in shambles, and a huge portion of it doesn’t work against our peer state adversaries, the one group where you need these things to actually be effective. You don’t seem to have a good grasp of how these systems work. Raw…

Don’t be thick, butkus. Occam’s Razor. What he wrote is completely accurate. It also seems to be near Twitter’s character limit. Any journalist worth their salt would have come to the much more important conclusion that Trump is implicit supportive of the B-21 and LRSO programs. If you want to understand what he…

Best comment here.

I’m guessing you made that comment sarcastically. However, Tump’s SecDef pick is exactly the kind of person you want educating Trump on these matters.

“Is... is there any support, outside Donald Trump’s warped mind, for an expanded nuclear arsenal? I could see support for modernizing the arsenal.”

Say whatever you want to an adult, but leave the kids out of it (from both families).

“This will inconvenience countless New Yorkers and essentially everyone else in the US government.”

Check out B. D. Wong just saying no to aging.