wytuh123
Wytuh123
wytuh123

‘Anyhow, I had this onion on my belt, which was the style at the time...’

my friend is a producer for 20/20 and I convinced her to pitch Flint for the next episode. I can only hope they dive deep into these very telling redacted emails

They were just using their black highlighters to point out all the most important stuff!

To a subset of mothers, “motherly” means “entirely up in and controlling of my daughter’s vagina.”

According to the linked article, there were only about six kids in the group. I cannot even FATHOM how she “suggested one was not” a virgin. Did she, like, point to one of them and go “this slut right here is CLEARLY catching dick left and right, but what about the rest of you?”

“So, are you girls virgins? I can tell Julie is not because look at her exposed ankles. That’s the mark of a hussy. Put some clothes on Julie.”

I didn’t catch that but you’re right; that is an interesting non-denial denial.

A number of us discover we cycle together.... Oh my God! We’re developing a hive mind and linked cycles! All women are becoming the same!

Also update if anyone hasn’t seen it:

GOOOOD!!

Fuck an alter boy and they just send you to another parish, ride a hoverboard and they suspend you. Flawless logic.

The dead end was frustrating, because, as a fat feminist, I was hungry to find out who the original poster could be so I could then eat them.

I always find it entertaining how these people always characterize feminists as simultaneously being unfuckable monsters and dick-hungry sluts.

I want to punch every person who is against refugees in the face. How can you turn people away when this is what they are fleeing? What woman (or child) would want to stay and be forced into sexual slavery?

Not surprised at all that CNN didn’t take her off the desk for the rest of the day just because her brain stopped working for a bit. Otherwise they’d have to fire Don Lemon.

This may not be romantic, but it does make sense to me. The judicial system is not like a religious court that can issue an annulment.

I'm sorry; my reply wasn't clear. I'm certainly not equating myself to the Mississippi freedom riders. I'm saying that they were good white people whose motives seemed altruistic rather than selfish.

Your essay makes me uncomfortable. I honestly don't know how to help or be an ally. I work with kids in the family court system, either through abuse/neglect or juvenile delinquency/incorrigability. I want to fight for these kids, the majority of whom are POC. How do we do that without becoming a "good white person"?

Would you have said the same thing to the white Mississippi freedom riders? They were good white people, too, and they paid the ultimate price for their decision to stand up for justice. Or the straight folk who mourned the death of Matthew Shepard? Or the men who fight for equal pay for women? Or the able-bodied

I guess the question is "How can white people be supportive of the issue without seeming to demean or take over the issue? " If white people don't talk talk about what they do in the situation, then the narrative is that white people are ignoring the issue (which so many do). If white people talk about the issue,