Flawed evidence? What’s flawed about it? He literally cites 2 reputable sources, and I could easily find you more with similar conclusions. Granted, what he implemented isn’t exactly what’s in the studies but A. it never will be and B. he has said that he intended it to be closer and that has since been fixed. It’s an…

How is that relevant? He quite clearly cites both studies and his own personal experience. Regardless, I fail to see your point? Are you saying Acidboogies point is completely irrelevant because it was based on studies and not experience? Also why are you putting “studies” in quotes, implying they’re not real studies?

No he doesn’t. He says that they’re “uncommon in his experience” and “many [...] are often actually gay” (emphasis mine). i.e. he intends it to be far less frequent than in females, but it is a bug that it completely does not exist currently. And he backs up those beliefs with studies.