I hope all the stars you get for this comment are well worth shutting down what could have been a thoughtful and honest conversation that many men have genuine concern about.

yeah, the pop culture reporter should be making sure to spell the name of a huge director correctly lol.

To be fair, Harvey Weinstein was chasing her for the last 3 miles.

Nope, won’t happen.

No way man. If you strike first, you have every fucking right to get your shit rocked. This is all on her.

He’s right and he’s wrong. Accepting a settlement and signing an NDA after being raped must feel like swallowing poison, and it is her choice to pursue fairness in the way she sees fit, but it leaves the matter out of Justice’s (larger sense of the word) hands.

Serious answer: That’s where the ball is spotted for a penalty kick.

And yet, he’s correct.

Actually, he was asked.

You really haven’t ever witnessed a sexual assault trial. I have. Defense attorneys can and do get vicious. Discrediting witnesses is the name of the game.

You seriously think the defense won’t use that against her to discredit her?

Will never stop being funny!

Still waiting on Jez commenters to tell me of one other instance where a white American who was under suspicion for committing a crime blamed an innocent black person (which Knox did) and then ended up not being the actual perp. Knox was involved.

I don’t think it is fair to say people are manipulated. I believe in the end, there isn’t enough proof that Rudy Guede acted alone without any help. Yes, the investigation was bungled. Yes, Rudy Guede is definitely guilty. But a lot of the “absolute proof Amanda Knox is innocent” is 100% made-up by her PR company,…

If Amanda Knox were A’mare Knox and a black man from Chicago, all other things being equal, you would find that the opinion in the United States would mirror that in the UK.

Hm. How about, “Amanda Knox Writes Tribute to the Dead Roommate She Did Not Murder Ten Years Ago”?

“But unlike Weinstein and other alleged predators, their apparent crime is not physical, then, it’s an intellectual one”

Thought police? Jesus christ. They absolutely deserve take downs and to be called out for their misogyny, but to escalate this to the level of “intellectual” crimes is absurd and embarrassing. What…

Well, I mean, this is just proper risk management. I don’t know why people are a) shocked; or b) think companies shouldn’t have this coverage.

I can’t control my employees. I can advise them not to behave in certain ways. I can publish an employee handbook that says sexual harassment (or ANY harassment) is against…

So were supposed to now call the guy a scum bag for not engaging in what is obvious pandering to the military/conservatives?

Scumbag? I don’t think that is fair. He declined an award because he disagrees with the entity supplying it, as is his right.