did you even read the politico article?

What did she do? From to the book excerpt:

Read the whole excerpt in Politico—Clinton used the DNC as a conduit to funnel larger campaign contributions than her campaign could legally accept back to her campaign.

It’s really weird to see “identity politics” and “intersectionality,” two terms derived from and key to understanding black Marxist feminism, both consistently misused. White brocialists have a horrible tendency towards class reductionism that elides the key roles of race, gender, and sexuality in understanding…

My point is that blindly supporting candidates just because they have a “D” next to their name, and blindly supporting the party because it’s “The Democrats” is foolish. Bernie is a democratic socialist, and DemSoc values are more traditionally democratic than the centrist/neoliberal garbage the Democratic party has…

Let’s be clear though — that advantage was with old voters. Millennials and under-40s were either heavily pro-Bernie or split, even among nonwhites.

He was supposed to be the cool Johnny Depp not the pirate Johnny Depp.

It’s beyond me that no one ever posts a picture of the rapists in these articles. It’s important to know who these people are, to crucify them and prop their fucking bodies up at the edge of town so they can’t ever slip back into society when/if they get out of jail.

A day after Gov. Jerry Brown called California a sanctuary state for undocumented immigrants, ICE countered with a threat. “ICE will have no choice but to conduct at-large arrests in local neighborhoods and at worksites, which will inevitably result in additional collateral arrests,” Acting Director Tom Homan wrote…

I worked on one of his movies a few years ago. I didn’t have a lot of contact with him, but when I did, it was generally unpleasant. His brother is even worse. And, yes, a lot of this stuff was public knowledge. Interjecting the gun control debate as a means of shielding himself just goes to show what a pig he is.

The only assumption I’ve made is that you hold women in low esteem, as your original comment suggests.

Bitch, where?

But you are classic victim-blaming. Why she was there has no bearing on what was done to her. It never does.

The ol’ “I don’t want to victim blame but...”

Ugh. I was wondering how long it would take for someone to reference the Marquis. The point here is *mainstreaming* of sexual violence. And the increase in availability is hardly “slight”. In the 1700's, this shit was practically unheard of in everyday life and certainly socially verboten. Fast-forward to 2017 and my…

except it feels like you do want to victim blame...........

How about all the studies that show violent porn creates more loving, stable relationships and creates a safer environment for women? /s

Young men are growing up thinking that rough anal sex is what chicks really want. I’d include more sources if I had loads of time, but here’s one:

Porn for straight men has become more violent and dehumanizing against women. That never ending quest for novelty and “forbidden fruit” ups the ante and more extreme images become normalized.