wolverine001
maximum_sarge
wolverine001

I think it depends on which people.

Fanboi is full of excuses. Swap the RS6 for the more comparable 911 Turbo. Dollar for dollar, your argument only gets worse. The fact that a big station wagon can hang? lol...

I would, but it seems you’ve run out of ways to be wrong?

Every time I see something like this I find myself trying to see if the firewall has been moved forward, because mid-engine rumors... This is probably just a Lykan test mule, though.

$175k GT-R Nismo. You can use launch control twice in a row. TWICE. LOFL.

The 911 Turbo is a closer comparison to the GT-R anyway, and that car can rip off 61 or more successive launch control runs without a problem. Try that in a GT-R, lol...

Now playing

Here’s your lesson for the day: Turns out VAG cars can do that all day long, or at least 61 times in a row...

see above. It’s not different enough to be a deciding factor.

The Audi costs more to own for five years, but not by enough that it matters at that price point (about $20k more in depreciation, service, etc). Edmunds gives the GT-R a cost to own of $108k vs the Audi at $128k... less than the cost of one out-of-warranty transmission replacement in the GT-R.

I’ve had cars from both Audi and Nissan (as well as Bentley, Porsche, Honda, BMW, Jeep, Mercedes, Saab, and on and on). Nissan is Japanese for ‘Pontiac’, as far as I could tell.

Given the cost of GT-R transmissions, yes.

There are some seriously fucking stupid people on the internet.

The sad thing is the Audi is also better looking, better built, with higher quality materials, with more utility and more luxury... for roughly the same price these days.

Were all four employees bound for Chicago outbound duty? ORD might not have been their final destination.

Unless you’re suicidal, if you’re doing serious wheeling you’ve got a real cage that blocks all those same sight lines...

How often have you done that, and for what reason or benefit?

This is a really stupid post, if I’m honest. They were nonrev passengers who are held to a higher standard than regular passengers. They were flying for free. The airlines (all of them) require such passengers (employees or relatives, etc) to dress nicely, conservatively, and hopefully attractively, and at the very

This is a really stupid post, if I’m honest. They were nonrev passengers who are held to a higher standard than regular passengers. They were flying for free. The airlines (all of them) require such passengers (employees or relatives, etc) to dress nicely, conservatively, and hopefully attractively, and at the very

‘Our cars aren’t very reliable’

Just have your ugliest wife act as the DD, and party with the others, like the governor does?