As said before it's not just about going 1000 MPH on land. In attempting to achieve that goal they'll be pushing a lot of existing technologies further than they've ever been and likely inventing or discovering new things in the process.
As said before it's not just about going 1000 MPH on land. In attempting to achieve that goal they'll be pushing a lot of existing technologies further than they've ever been and likely inventing or discovering new things in the process.
10.) Plymouth Voyager III (1990)
Yes it does, at least on the base C7, making his comment a bit nonsensical. If the manual's clutch isn't a problem why would a DCT where the clutch is in the computer's hands cause problems?
As the C7 has cylinder deactivation on the manual, how does that make any sense? Anything that works on a straight manual where the computer has zero clutch control should work great on a DCT where the computer has full clutch control.
Was a GenV LS7 successor (i.e. big, high-revving, NA) just not doable?
StarCraft 2, okay, I can see where single player could have an offline mode.
Yeah, just like any other stick-shift C7. The paddles control the automatic rev-match feature in the manuals.
It has a manual shift option (but no paddles), although shifts up and down are neither fast nor direct. What I'd really love is the option of a stick shift with the larger engine. That would spice things up quite a bit.
Yup, that is the key whenever doing things in a non-ideal manner is to understand the limitations. Having enough of a feel for how your vehicle should handle lets you know how much the load is upsetting that, and thus get an idea of how to properly drive it with the load.
Yeah, he basically could have done anything other than hit the truck brakes and it would have gone better.
Can't echo this enough. It's important.
If the wheels and their associated mounting hardware can withstand launching the car full force, they can withstand pulling it backwards up a hill. IIRC the undersides of C7s are fairly flat, so even dragging on the ground as it is it shouldn't actually be that much more force than if you were to back up a hill with…
The forum users that specified positioning all noted using the non-LATCH seat in a specific side position, with the LATCH seats in the center and other side, so based on that I think your assumption is incorrect and one of the two center-adjacent lower points has two mounts.
Yeah, from some Tesla forums it seems like one of the side positions shares a lower anchor point with the center, so you can use both sides or one side and center, but if you have three it's recommended to put the non-LATCH unit in one of the side positions. I'd guess this is related to the seat folding, presuming…
Does anyone know if *any* sedan available today that can legally seat a family of five, where at least one is in a child safety seat?
So you want more of the weight up front to start, making it less balanced while still not changing anything about what you said?
RWD is the worst in winter, even with winter tires, theres just no weight on the back
AWD w/winters > FWD w/winters > AWD > FWD > RWD w/winters > RWD or something along those lines.
DOUBLE NOPE.
Yeah, the most popular console homebrew platform to ever exist didn't have a lot of dev interest. Right. /s