I think he’s referring to a scene in Batman Returns where he stuffs a bomb into the belt of a goon and kicks off a precipice.

And he mentions this consistently in social media posts, to reinforce that it’s not a sequel or an adaptation of an existing intellectual property. It’s technically true but maybe not something to tout about a film that is about as derivative as it gets.

I’d like to know if anyone has sung at the bar, put bread in your jar, and said Man what are you doin’ here?

Strewth!

I checked out the Amazon listing, and look at this shit in the description:

Agreed on all fronts.

Sure, but not legally.

Up here in Canada, with recreational use becoming legal nationwide in only a few months, the government has clearly signaled that there will be rules for packaging of cannabis products to ensure they are not (intentionally or not) made appealing to minors. And edibles are off-limits at the outset till they can figure…

That reminds me, the pit bull curling machine has been out of order at my gym for weeks now!

If you watch to the end of the clip, it ends with him carrying the elevator back up the stairs.

This looks like it was shot in the torture chambers of the greater Vancouver area.

Surely at this point this is a largely symbolic move given that the most populous state in the nation has just legalized recreational use?

You’re right - it was added in the early 80s.

There was always the fact that Star Wars began on Episode IV...

I figured they were drawing a distinction between a movie that was set in the same universe, occurring chronologically prior to the events of the main series, and a true prequel which primarily involved the same characters and storylines from the main series.

The regulations are going to strictly control the type of advertising and promoting that authorized sellers can do, so I expect that they will be pretty subdued and neutral, at least at the outset.

From a certain point of view, maybe.

“If I have to sign a sexual-harassment thing, I don’t care, I’ll sign it”

Mr. Brownstone?

I think I see an issue here, you put the “AT” in “AT-AT” that stands for “all-terrain” second, and the other “AT” - that stands for “armored transport” - first. I think if you switch them around it reads much more clearly.