The regulations are going to strictly control the type of advertising and promoting that authorized sellers can do, so I expect that they will be pretty subdued and neutral, at least at the outset.

From a certain point of view, maybe.

“If I have to sign a sexual-harassment thing, I don’t care, I’ll sign it”

Mr. Brownstone?

I think I see an issue here, you put the “AT” in “AT-AT” that stands for “all-terrain” second, and the other “AT” - that stands for “armored transport” - first. I think if you switch them around it reads much more clearly.

That is a pretty good Harrison Ford impression.

Nice work kid, take the rest of the fucking day off!

If it was about a Lyft driver, the guy’s name would be Cliff.

Nice, thanks.

Who is that old dude in the publicity photo? He looks familiar.

For anyone that followed the Jian Ghomeshi saga, the actress that is suing Weinstein has hired the lawyer that defended Ghomeshi in his criminal trial.

No, a spoon. I’m not a monster.

I do the same thing whenever my friends take a dick pic. Reactions are similar.

Co-signed.

Would the scarf attack go something like this?

Replied to the wrong comment, to re-post: it’s pretty common for NDAs to include a clause that permits disclosure of confidential information if the recipient is compelled to disclose it pursuant to a law or court order or some other legal process. But usually with some qualifications to support the overall objective…

It’s pretty common for NDAs to include a clause that permits disclosure of confidential information if the recipient is compelled to disclose it pursuant to a law or court order or some other legal process. But usually with some qualifications to support the overall objective of protecting that information - e.g.…

“164,000 tons! That’s too much work, even for a veteran Sith Lord. Godzilla would give him a spontaneous Viking funeral within seconds.”

I really like “they’re going to be going out either today or tomorrow” - that’s exactly what I say to someone at work when I haven’t started the assignment that they’ve asked me about. 

I think it would depend on the jurisdiction - I am in an employee-friendly jurisdiction and I think most judges here would happily find a way to express their disapproval over any contractual term that facilitated or condoned the mistreatment of employees. The employer may not even need to void it - they could claim…