my life is pretty easy at the moment, but i appreciate your sympathies nonetheless. again this post is a limited criticism of brooks’s column itself, which does not mention anything about clinton’s record, and merely says she needs to open up and be warmer, and i personally find that remarkable

yeah, i don’t disagree with you on the identity politics nightmare of the dem race right now at all, but it is still incredibly remarkable to me that david brooks pinpoints neither her record or her gender as the source of unlikability — and instead brings up the fact that she needs HOBBIES

That’s the bizarre part. But, personally I’d never use an open tampon. So, maybe she is in on it which makes me even madder for some reason.

If this had happened to me, it wouldn’t be posted in the comedy section, it would be under crime because I surely would have killed him when I saw him holding out the pepper.

Are you new?

of course not. the sarcasm is pretty obvious. lots of people write comments that end with ‘fixed it for you’ and I find it very obnoxious. I can handle getting mean tweets and being told I’m a garbage person, but I dislike it when people reformat a sentence like I should be glad they put words in my mouth. I’m sure…

so.... basic yoga?

Also worth noting that most men (in my experience) have skin in pretty bad shape because they don’t think about the kind of cleansers they use, moisturizer, etc. Whereas most women have really good skin, barring actual dermatological disorders.

What the fuck did we ever do to you??

I’ll take unnecessarily angry responses for 600, Alex!

TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS for a poorly-done plug for protein powder.

Ok. So don’t vote for Bill Clinton.

Season 6's biggest fault so far (even more so than Dorne) has been the complete lack of Bronn.

“Jedi Brett Michaels”

The Democrats need to drop the Dangerous Donald angle and just alternate between using “Tantrum Trump,” “Touchy Trump,” and “Digitally-impaired Donald” until November. For a man who rose to power on the anti-politically-correct backlash, the guy could teach a class on oversensitivity.

I’m not really thrilled with the “mirror” concept. The idea of women as “reflecting surfaces” is pretty... regressive. I don’t see how this is different from saying “you reflect the light of God.” It’s just replacing a male God with “nature”. The end result is the same: Women are dehumanized.

Yeah, I’m not really thrilled with the reinforcement of the idea of women’s bodies as an “embodiment of nature” more than men’s bodies. The woman-as-nurturing-earth-mother-figure is not necessarily feminist. When it’s used to suggest that women are fundamentally different from men—more nurturing, more connected to…

Yeah, I have a hard time seeing it as anything else too. It’s amazing how naked women can be used as a symbol for nearly anything. Thing is, no matter what the subject, it’s still objectification. This thing is especially dubious since it’s a white dude yelling “for our daughters!” LOL, wut?

The philosophy of the artwork relates to the idea of the sacred feminine.