On a personal level, at least Sony and Microsoft are buying up studios who make games I don't really give a shit about, so any exclusivity for future games isn't something for me to worry about.

Clearly you haven’t eaten at the Thai restaurant down the street from me.

Can’t wait for the crypto bros to start complaining here about how Kotaku is so mean to all these poor NFTs :)

I think she’s just using sex as a crotch.

How come all genocide articles in MSM sites are negative? Total sensationalism.

Beeeeeeecause crypto is a joke and negative by default? Makes sense that reporting on negative crap would come off as negative.

Because crypto (douche chills even writing that) deserves it.

Very cool and correct.

He’s not wrong, though.

The word you’re looking for is “accurate”

They look more cool and reasonable than either of the pro NFT comments in this thread.

Because everything about crypto is negative.

They have 3 posts in their history, they are NFT scammer bros, pieces of shits.

Yeah, that’s the thing. There is literally nothing an NFT can do in a game that can’t be done better with a database.

There’s nothing positive to write about NFTs in games. If someone actually manages to come up with some good use for them along with a mining system that is energy efficient and that won’t get exponentially worse over the years, then maybe there will be positive words to say.

Because crypto fucking sucks and the only people that think otherwise are the ones buying into the scheme?

because crypto is a scam.

Maybe publishers just need an employee to literally draw out the pyramid scheme to them

Kotaku keeps claiming that the new Kirby is supposed to be open-world like Mario Odyssey or Breath of the Wild, when nothing so far has suggested that.