Maybe you are confused because I wasn’t talking to you. My comments make perfect sense in response to the people I’m responding to. What point that I've made don’t you understand?

You are saying that you DO know by insisting that you KNOW for a fact that they are not. Why it that so hard for YOU to understand? Unless there is a party insider here to confirm or deny your framing then your question won’t be answered. I have no reason to believe that they haven’t already wasted tons of time…

I repeat... I'm confident that you don’t know anything about the inner workings of the Green Party including who the leadership does or doesn’t listen to for strategy. 

Who says I'm worried about anything? I'm stating facts.

Apparently whatever Dems are doing here isn’t working either. You don’t know anything about the inner workings of the Green Party including who the leadership does or doesn’t listen to for strategy. The only antidote to the 2 party system is rank choice voting. That is something that is completely irrelevant to…

Over 300,000 registered Democrats voted for Bush in Florida.

What evidence do you have that European Greens would do ANY better in the US system? Or that any tactics or topics that they use in Europe translate here?

The polls were not accurate. Most of them had Clinton winning by many points. They completely screwed up who the ‘likely voters’ would be.

AGAIN.. The parliamentary system is completely different than the system we have which rewards the two top parties only. They literally have nothing to offer on how to win in this system. They are also fighting completely different issues. Our most liberal politicians are like Conservatives to them. It is apples and…

They have a completely different voting system and electorate though, so why should they listen to them?

I wouldn’t even give them the satisfaction of partially agreeing with his point that Stein voters would have voted for Clinton. Stein comes in 4th to ‘Other’ in almost every state. This whole article could be about ‘Other’ and be just as accurate and ridiculous. More registered Dems voted for Bush/McCain/Trump than…

Most people didn’t even think Clinton v Trump was a toss-up. Clinton wanted to go against Trump because it was supposed to be easy. Now people are supposed to know ahead of time who is going to show up to vote and how it’s going to go? The last election showed that even the polls don’t even know for sure.

These arguments are silly. Accept how our system works or work to change it. There is a solution to this. It’s called rank choice voting. Writing articles like this without evening mentioning it is just spitting in the wind. There will always be 3rd parties. The Libertarian candidate was much stronger and took away…

Again... That is about that person and has nothing to do with you.

My statement about KC is for him. He knows why. He has a very similar statement about me in the comments section. Because he is a child that does things like that and deletes any direct responses. My comment was a response to a child playing his game..

Well I don't remember you.... Sooooo. Post whatever link that you have.

What the fuck are you talking about idiot

Fuck off. Mind your business. Stop dick ridin'.

That may be true for some of the writes... But definitely not for the commenters here.

Don’t bother debating KC on anything... He’ll ignore 99% of what you said and then spend 500 words talking about something completely irrelevant to your point. I think Bernie Sanders must have stole his girl or punched his mom or something since he has to come on every Sanders story and make-up shit about him.